Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan offices (2011)

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by jackhack on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:01PM (#15358811)

Here's a policy: Regardless of what's in your underpants -- don't sneeze in the air, don't cough on people and keep thy cooties to thyself. Pretty simple really.

Not everything is about sexual identity. This SJW nonsense has gone over the top. Please don't try to convince me we need a non-binary-trans-sneeze policy because of white cis privilege because you'd be wasting your time. If so, we have reached cultural peak absurdity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by virmundi on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:09PM (#15358891)

Nope, not convincing you that you need a non-binary sneeze policy. I'm using that as an example of having policies that make sense when dealing with a minor population. The original example was people with sinititius and being able to comply with the policy. Also, another goal was to make people think do we even need such a draconian sneeze policy to begin with? What about the science that says that the more things you are exposed to the more resilient your system?

[ Parent | on HN ]