News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by joelrunyon on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:03PM (#14020161)
They also sweeten the deal so that if you cancel more than 5 minutes AFTER you accept the fare, they still charge you a cancellation fee.

So, they give you a pie-in-the-sky estimate, you wait ten minutes, realize it's still gonna be an extra 10 minutes and then cancel because you can grab a taxi right there and they want to charge you a cancellation fee.

I understood that when they were at least close on their estimate times, but now it just seems like they're intentionally being difficult.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by macNchz on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:30PM (#14020225)
I stopped using Uber after a couple of instances where a driver accepted my ride request and then drove steadily in the opposite direction for quite a while before canceling and triggering a charge to my account for not 'being where I was supposed to be'.

Each time this happened on a busy Manhattan avenue where I watched empty yellowcabs fly past for 15 minutes. Totally infuriating. Used to take a few per month but now haven't taken an Uber since September.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by dcosson on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:55AM (#14020673)
I've had this a few times too. I assume it's a driver trick to drive in the wrong direction so the rider has to cancel, pay the cancellation fee, and you don't even get to rate the driver in that case so it doesn't affect their score.

I'm not sure why they don't just decline the fare, but maybe they don't see the destination until they accept and they don't want to go there, or maybe Uber penalizes them for declining too many fares and this is a hack around that.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by gommm on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:28AM (#14021775)
In my experience Uber is quite good at refunding the cancellation fee when you tell them what happened.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by cynicalkane on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:22AM (#14020588)
I live in NYC. That used to be a frequent problem, but I haven't had that happen to me recently. Whenever it did happen, I would cancel, contact support, and get my $5 back. It only takes a few minutes to contact support from within the app.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by macNchz on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:56AM (#14020675)
I was able contest the fee each time (with an extra step to get it actually refunded rather than a credit for future rides), but the reason I started using Uber to begin with was largely about accountability and convenience, both of which seemed to be on the decline when this was happening. Plus there's something especially insulting about being charged a fee for the privilege of being stood up.

Maybe things have improved recently but their corporate behavior hasn't given me much reason to start using the app again.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by nemo44x on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:46AM (#14023669)
Having lived (and survived!) the NYC dating scene it took me until the "I would cancel, contact support..." part of your post to realize you were talking about Uber and not the lunatics you encounter during the NYC dating experience.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mannykannot on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:25PM (#14020410)
That is not going to win the driver a good rating - or do you not get to rate the driver in that case? Either way, a pattern of such events (with the same bogus reason given) would suggest that someone - the drivers, Uber itself, or both - has found a way to screw customers.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by jghn on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:28AM (#14020599)
It's the drivers. If you read /r/uberdrivers one discovers that there are a host of tricks designed to game the system.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mannykannot on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:24AM (#14021978)
Uber presents itself as the alternative to customer-unfriendly taxis and cab companies. So much for that.

Maybe its worth having a cup of coffee in hand to drop on the upholstery if the driver tries that trick.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by Paul-ish on Monday April 03, 2017 @02:00AM (#14020873)
Seems only fair if the system is rigged against you.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mannykannot on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:20AM (#14021965)
But the drivers' beef is with Uber, not the customer.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by jghn on Monday April 03, 2017 @08:39AM (#14022303)
Right. Regardless of if their sentiment is justified or not generally what you see from the drivers on that sub is a sentiment of "damn the man" against uber itself.

Occasionally this behavior will be described as linked to riders in annoying locations or with low ratings but usually it's uber they're targeting

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by Bartweiss on Monday April 03, 2017 @10:30AM (#14022998)
This seems like something that could kill Uber eventually. Their whole setup is pathological, most of the drivers and riders I know have an array of tricks to use or watch out for, and the results are deeply unpleasant.

I suppose the bar set by cabs is really low, since I've never worried about an Uber driver mugging me or kicking me out in an empty industrial park, but it's still ugly. I'd pay more for something that was just "cabs, but we actually don't scam you".

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by Bartweiss on Monday April 03, 2017 @10:27AM (#14022975)
Since you cancel, you don't get to rate them, which is why the trick works.

You can contact support for a refund, but I don't know if that data is connected back to the drivers doing it - I doubt it if the trick is still popular.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by raverbashing on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:36PM (#14020440)
Complain to Corp
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by ianamartin on Monday April 03, 2017 @02:57AM (#14021065)
On the other hand, I haven't had good experiences with other services. Coming home from my last trip to Texas I landed at LaGuardia and there was a guy there asking if I needed a car. I was super tired, so I just said, yeah, how much to get to <my address>. He says 60 bucks, and I can smoke in the car.

Okay fine. Whatever. Get to my place, and oh, it's 80 bucks. Seriously?! Okay fine. I tipped him anyway because that's what you do. Threw 20 bucks down for an even 100. Not the worst I've been screwed. And getting to smoke in the car on the way home was kind of nice.

Fucker charged me $140.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by JDiculous on Monday April 03, 2017 @05:17AM (#14021528)
Uber also won't tell you when they charge you a cancellation fee.

They'll pop a message saying something like "Sorry about that your driver had to cancel. But don't worry there are other drivers". But then you check your ride history and you've been charged $5.

Downright unethical and should be illegal.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by ikeboy on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:10PM (#14020175)
They usually refund the cancel fee if you ask. I've had issues with both uber and lyft where cancel fees were charged when I wasn't at fault (driver went to wrong place, etc) and just reported and got refunded.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by CoolGuySteve on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:47PM (#14020287)
They don't refund, they just credit your account. It didn't count for much after I switched to Lyft entirely.

In general, I find Lyft is wholly more pleasant, both as an app and as a customer.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by remarkEon on Monday April 03, 2017 @03:23AM (#14021136)
If you push enough, they will. Once I had an 18 hour layover in Honolulu and I decided to go to the Pearl Harbor memorial (sentimental, I know) and Uber was a mess. I got cancelled on, and I cancelled one...both times I was charged the fee. After a few emails of back and forth they actually refunded my credit card instead of just giving me "Uber credits."
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by nommm-nommm on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:28AM (#14023474)
They will put it back on your card if you ask. It's a dark pattern for sure though.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mannykannot on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:12PM (#14020370)
You should not have to ask for a refund if, after reasonable time after the original estimate has passed, the cab has not appeared. Of course, Uber is also free to screw around with the customers to the extent that they will acquiesce to it.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by ikeboy on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:23PM (#14020396)
No argument there.

I've also had times where the charge was more than it showed upfront. I think what's going on there is I'm let off and the driver marks it as the location I left, which is a tiny bit away from the original destination, so it recalculates the fee and no longer uses the fixed fee. They should be able to tell if the dropoff location is within say 1000 feet of the expected destination and not charge more.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by johnfn on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:31PM (#14020226)
I've requested a refund multiple times and never been rejected.

Furthermore, when the estimates are more than a couple of minutes off as GP suggests, Uber waives the cancellation fee.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by joelrunyon on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:45PM (#14020280)
I don't think that's true unless you specifically request it.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by akinalci on Monday April 03, 2017 @02:39AM (#14020992)
With pool at least, I've had them charge me a fee when I cancel immediately.

I was in a rush to the train station and accidentally booked a pool. I cancelled within a few seconds and booked an Uber X, but they still charged a cancellation fee.

And I was in a rush because the first pool I booked that morning didnt show up (he called and asked me to cancel).

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by tehlike on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:09PM (#14020173)
i wonder if you could dispute through credit card. they would have paid more for such stupid system.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mahyarm on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:35PM (#14020236)
It's faster and easier to just get a refund through the app first, and then try a credit card dispute. %99 of the time they do it. I've never had something not refunded when it should of been.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by chinathrow on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:41PM (#14020261)
> %99 of the time they do it.

This would need to stop - how many of the clients file a dispute? Maybe a large percentage of HN readers - but not so much from the general public. Uber wins money it never was entitled to. No service provided, no pay.

I see now why legislation might have been the better choice, after all.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by praneshp on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:49PM (#14020294)
I don't think that is correct. I'd wager that people outside of HN would spend more time to make sure their $5 is returned.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by stouset on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:56PM (#14020498)
If you're suggesting that lower-income people would be more likely to dispute the charge due to it having a larger impact on their bottom line, I strongly suspect you're wrong.

People in that demographic tend to, in my experience, not put forward the effort to get things like that refunded. Even though the money is important to them, it's frequently conditioned that it will take hours of time and effort to recoup the $5, and that's hours and effort they simply don't have.

Whether or not it actually takes that amount of time is irrelevant. The problem is that people expect it will take too much of their time to deal with and simply let the money go.

This is yet another example of Uber treating their customers like shit. If it's easy enough for them to determine that the cancellation was legitimate and issue the refund, they should do so proactively. Waiting for customers to complain before returning money they collected for a service they did not provide is as user-hostile as anything else they do.

I will never give another dollar of my money to Uber.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by chinathrow on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:06AM (#14020537)
As others have pointed it out - they don't even return the money. They credit your account which is even worse than taking it the first time.

I reckon a class action regarding this scummy behaviour will be filed soon.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by tehlike on Monday April 03, 2017 @01:24AM (#14020761)
filing through credit card would cost uber money. consider it a punishment (For the lack of a better word) by the consumer.

Whether it works out in favor of consumer is a question. I would probably not use uber in the first place.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by mahyarm on Monday April 03, 2017 @02:55AM (#14021059)
Filing a charge back with a credit card company is painful compared to complaining about something in the $rideshare_company app in 2 minutes, and then getting refunded in less than a day. It's your life / time.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by tehlike on Monday April 03, 2017 @08:37PM (#14028560)
the downside is it's in terms of "Credit". With dispute, it's as good as cash.

The difference between the two might be less than many would think.

Also with dispute, you are sending business a message: if they charge you for their mistakes (in scheduling), you'll look for disputing (which costs them around 25$/dispute, i believe?).

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by soloadventurer on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:47PM (#14039261)
In Vietnam, Uber required a credit card for the longest time. This is a silly position to take, given most Vietnamese do not have credit cards. You can now use Uber without a credit card, but Uber's position had a cost.

Grab Taxi has now taken much of the market and do not require a credit card. I will never use a hailing service requiring a credit card, and as such I can never be charged a cancellation fee.

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by edoceo on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:09AM (#14020550)
That's almost as bad as the Taxi companies!!
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by eon1 on Monday April 03, 2017 @12:53AM (#14020665)
How so? If I book a taxi and then don't show up they can't charge me a thing. Quite the opposite, they send me a text saying "driver couldn't find you, reply YES if you still need a cab".
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by JumpCrisscross on Monday April 03, 2017 @04:19AM (#14021310)
I've been required to give a credit card over the phone to book. When the taxi didn't show up thirty minutes later, it was a chargeback to avoid their fees. Uber is becoming a horrible company. But in most cities (e.g. Silicon Valley, Austin, D.C., New York) they replaced something much, much worse.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by nommm-nommm on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:33AM (#14023520)
Wow, that's awful, sounds like a blatant cash grab! You're basically guaranteed money from everyone that calls, there's no incentive to have enough drivers to cover demand.

---

It's been my experience that, when calling, I've never waited less than 20 minutes for a cab and often have waited an hour. It's amazing that taking the bus is quicker than calling a cab. Once I actually was unable to even get through. I was in a small hotel lobby and the owner offered to give me a ride instead. Later on, in another hotel lobby, I paid it forward and offered to give a lady a ride to the airport when she was having trouble getting a cab on the phone.

I guess my point is, for all its flaws, Uber is still better than a taxi in less populated areas....

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by edoceo on Monday April 03, 2017 @01:01AM (#14020693)
I did say almost. In place of an app, a charge and a process to ask for a refund I have to call someone to order a car. Then it shows up more or less on time and costs some money.

Read all the other complaints here. There is very little difference​ between Uber and Lyft and the age old cab companies.