Re:Pop Music Critic Leaves the New Yorker to Annotate Lyrics...
by GabrielF00 on Monday January 12, 2015 @08:44AM
(#8873791)
> “Their plan was just” — he used an expletive perhaps appropriate for his new role at the iconoclastic start-up — “really impressive.”
Gotta love The New York Times. It takes them fourteen words to avoid printing the word "fucking". And of course they imply that a culture critic at a serious publication like The New Yorker would never countenance the use of casual profanity. Only a young start-up whippersnapper.
Re:Pop Music Critic Leaves the New Yorker to Annotate Lyrics...
by k-mcgrady on Monday January 12, 2015 @09:13AM
(#8873910)
>> "And of course they imply that a culture critic at a serious publication like The New Yorker would never countenance the use of casual profanity. Only a young start-up whippersnapper."
I don't think it's a reference to startups in general but to this particular startup.
Re:Pop Music Critic Leaves the New Yorker to Annotate Lyrics...
by kissickas on Monday January 12, 2015 @09:46AM
(#8874088)
Even if we can, HN users are likely familiar with Genius. Should we really stick to the original headline so closely in cases like this when the title editorializes more than the clearer alternative "... for Genius"?
Gotta love The New York Times. It takes them fourteen words to avoid printing the word "fucking". And of course they imply that a culture critic at a serious publication like The New Yorker would never countenance the use of casual profanity. Only a young start-up whippersnapper.
One is reminded of Family Guy's take on The New Yorker. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6MyeCXmiKw
I don't think it's a reference to startups in general but to this particular startup.
A simple google search also shows this to be true (fuck site:newyorker.com).
They were on HN A LOT a while back because of all the controversy around them.
It's time to start taking this company seriously.
No bubble here, though.