> Your browser doesn't support all of the features required for this demo. Please consider using the latest version of Chrome.

I guess "today's web" is not an Open web, and has a single-point-of-failure hard-dependency on Google (at multiple levels).

It also works in Firefox, Opera, and WebKit. The only modern browsers left out appears to be Safari 7 (no WebGL) and IE (Web Audio).

Give it a year and both of those are likely to work.

Indeed. If the authors stop by, consider changing the message to something more like

"Your browser does no appear to support a couple things required to play this presentation(WebGL, Web Audio etc). The latest versions of several browsers do. You might want to try one of those instead."

thanks, yes, working on a fix right now. we also want to make it clear that those things are not necessarily required for p5.js itself, just the demo.

but they're obviously required to do things in the demo no?

Safari 7 has WebGL but is disabled by default. Enable developer menus, then click on "Enable WebGL".

> The only modern browsers left out appears to be Safari 7 (no WebGL)

Safari has WebGL since 5-ish but disabled by default.

To enable, Safari > Preferences > Advanced > Show Develop menu, then Develop > Enable WebGL

The presentation seems to work allright, although it suffers from some slowdowns.

I'm aware of that but it effectively doesn't exist for the public if it's gated behind a developer option. This goes double for Safari on iOS.

That said, I was happy to have it run well on my system with WebGL enabled since that should make it a smooth transition when Safari 8 is released.

Works perfectly in Safari 8 running in Yosemite Beta

Yeah, I'm expecting WebGL to be realistic for many sites in the next year. Even Microsoft is moving to automatic updates and Apple would be foolish not to release Safari 8 at least on 10.8/10.9 since the WebKit nightly builds run perfectly there.

played perfectly on Firefox (Win8.1 Firefox 31.0) for me, I think Chrome is just a suggestion.

It doesn't work in IE11. That page (not the library) does a test for Modernizr.webaudio, which IE11 fails.

For what it's worth, I was browsing with Iceweasel on Debian-stable.

Well, you're comment made me aware I'd better restart my iceweasel session, I'd already upgraded from 29 to 31, but was running old code. And then I found out I'll probably have to reboot, as firefox/iceweasel tries to pull in nouveau-based drivers... and I'm running the binary-blob nvidia drivers.

So, still no webgl, but with any luck xorg will come up with accelerated 3d on next re-boot - and webgl will work too.

I do wish more hw companies would just release free and open drivers...

This particular rig is a hand-me-down -- next gpu will be radeon, among other things for their efforts to be a better driver-citizen than nvidia. Even if for a certain set of configurations, nvidia has delivered better actual hw performance under Linux, for certain fixed configurations.

It worked for me on Firefox. 31 but there have been so many times I was disappointed.

Also the demo/intro was fantastic.

Definitely interesting, but it's unfortunately not very accessible; much of the information is only conveyed through the audio, and the video doesn't have any subtitles or a transcript.

He keeps referring to "this circle", but I think I'm missing something. Is it a metaphorical circle?

Edit: OK, eventually I saw some of the stuff he was talking about, but only around the edges of the video frame. It looks like the most of the demo part was hidden behind the video.

Further edit: After trying it in firefox, I now realize that the demo just completely doesn't work in Chrome on my machine. The video plays with a big green rectangular background that pretty much breaks the presentation.

It's video in a canvas element which overlays a background canvas visualization. It's unclear in the video if P5.js controls both the video and the visuals, I suspect it does.

However, it looks clear to me that a collision detection circle is added to the background visualization, and that the videography is designed to synchronize with that circle. The presenter's head represents the collision zone, where the circle is positioned. It makes the presenters head a "bounce away" zone. It's video/canvas orchestration.

God I wish I could scrub the video, though.

I would like to say it looks very neat. Hoping the guys chime in on how it parallels or surpasses existing tools. The canvas + feature mashup does appear to have great potential. There is limited reason to believe canvas elements are handicap accessible, unless you invest a large amount of time in custom markup configurations which the framework doesn't appear to have addressed.

Wow. At first I thought it was just a video, but its more like an "interactive intro". I remember being introduced to Processing years ago in CMU's Intro to Programming class, glad to see that it's still being used and developed.

Yeah... The interactive video is really cool. It looks like they're using popcorn.js for it (although I'm still watching, and haven't completely checked out the source).

It's a neat idea, but I wish they'd just put the normal controls on the video. I couldn't read the text fast enough to take it in along with the voiceover, there's no ability to rewind if you miss something, and there's no indication of how long the whole thing lasts or whether you'll be able to replay it when it finishes. It sounds like I missed out on something interesting that happens later, but I gave up in frustration after a minute or two, and I expect I lasted longer than a lot of people will.

Thanks, but the video file alone loses the context that is intended. In particular, you can't see the other information that is overlaid in the intended presentation.

I think this is a pretty good demonstration of combining video and non-video information, but it also demonstrates a significant weakness of doing that if you aren't careful about how to synchronize data from the different sources.

Agreed.

On a slow connection, between buffering and no rewind button, this was rather hard to watch.

It was good, but I don't know if I would call it great. The technology is interesting - and maybe that's what matters to most people here - but I found the male presenter (Dan?) to be... distracting, to say the least. My first thought when he started talking was, "wow, is this guy on drugs or what?" And I just couldn't focus on anything he said.

That was my first thought too. Dan might as well be wearing a "LEGALIZE LSD" t-shirt.

http://vimeo.com/channels/natureofcode/ You'll get used to Dan very quickly after a few of these videos.

I had the opposite reaction. I found him laid back, fun and refreshingly unaffected. Not stilted or 'canned' as so many speakers can often seem, myself included.

Doesn't display right for me http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm249/hrenistic/p5_zps408...

Either on Chromium 34 or Firefox 30 on Ubuntu.

source : https://github.com/scottgarner/p5.js-video/