News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by Goosey on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:04PM (#7476184)
After making it all the way to the exoplanets and back to the higgs I nearly gave up before finally realizing I could scroll down.

I hate this trend in web design.

Re:Google I/O 2014 by atonse on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:13PM (#7476257)
Oh geez. I didn't even know you could scroll down. I played around for a bit, thought "ok what's the point of this?" and just moved on.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by untog on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:27PM (#7476370)
I blame the trend in UI design to hide scroll bars. On desktop they're perfectly visible and it's not so difficult to work out that you need to scroll.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by abraham on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @09:20PM (#7477933)
In Chrome on OS X I'm seeing a scroll bar always visible on the I/O page.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by darrenkopp on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @10:04PM (#7478120)
Same for Firefox on Windows
Re:Google I/O 2014 by cwilson on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:46PM (#7476893)
The first slide is to blame, not the overall design. I scrolled from the get-go, but that's because I didn't engage with the "play" button on the first slide which seems like the only thing they want you to do. If there were no way to interact with something in that first slide, you'd scroll.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by piyush_soni on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:32PM (#7476821)
What the ... I didn't realize that till I read this post of yours even after playing all those clicking games. I thought since it's far away, may be they only have these animations here and someone shared it only because of them.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by lloeki on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:26PM (#7476367)
In all honesty I did scroll but didn't realise it was interactive until reading your comment, bewildered reading about Higgs and planets
Re:Google I/O 2014 by stronglikedan on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:06PM (#7476663)
I hate that I have to scroll at all to read a couple hundred words at most, let alone scroll five freakin' times on a 1080 display.

Edit: And why in the world am I getting the webcam indicator on this site‽

Re:Google I/O 2014 by angrydev on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:25PM (#7476343)
No idea you could scroll down either, I just closed the tab and moved on.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by negrit on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:05PM (#7476195)
I'm glad I checked the comments here... This design doesn't make sense.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by laureny on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:26PM (#7476793)
Also, the page wants to use my microphone, did anyone try to speak to it?
Re:Google I/O 2014 by WalterSear on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @06:27PM (#7477098)
It fuddles some of the animation sequences at the top of the page. The spinning satellite changes direction on a sound, for example.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by amaks on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:31PM (#7476393)
If you were attentive, you could notice "continue to site" arrow on the very first screen.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by awj on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:00PM (#7476620)
If your UI requires that users "be attentive" just to discover the content you're trying to convey, then your UI is awful and the user's failure to see it is entirely your fault.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by ryannevius on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @07:16PM (#7477371)
Well said. I blame it partially on designer groupthink.

Of course design elements (color, typeface, white space, etc) are important...but visitors of your site are interested in consuming content NOW (not a few seconds form now). People are lazy.

Re:Google I/O 2014 by aasarava on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @07:34PM (#7477472)
Actually, I'm inclined to bet this was one designer's concept and not the work of many people reviewing prototypes and giving feedback.

Design-by-group tends to produce boring, cluttered, seen-it-before layouts with little innovation. This seems to be on the completely opposite end of the spectrum -- with no one saying, "Uh, wait -- I think you need to make it clear that you can scroll for more info."

(And also: "Uh, I'm not sure developers are going to take kindly to Google requesting access to their microphones so soon after the NSA revelations.")

Re:Google I/O 2014 by judk on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @11:24PM (#7478404)
That's not actually what "groupthink" means, so you aren't really disagreeing.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by teraflop on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:57PM (#7476596)
It's very light gray text on a white background, with a very thin line weight, and it disappears as soon as you start interacting with the page.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by judk on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @11:23PM (#7478399)
And that link just jumps you another animation, where you would then be as stuck as in the first place, with no more guidance link.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by camilo_u on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:09PM (#7476224)
Actually I just realized I could scroll with your comment!
Re:Google I/O 2014 by Detrus on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:29PM (#7476379)
It used to be much worse with flashy microsites. You'd open them and wait minutes for the first page to load. Then click somewhere and wait again. And the UIs would be much more confusing. Scrollwheel would be disabled.

This flash throwback at the top with a scroll to the rest of the site that loads instantly is a big step forward.

Re:Google I/O 2014 by rumdz on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:31PM (#7476398)
Wow, I just did the same thing. I actually wouldn't have scrolled down if it wasn't for your comment.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by stewdio on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @10:49PM (#7478272)
That’s a shame because selfishly I want everyone to see the second slide which is of the Racer game we unveiled at last year’s I/O. Was a proud moment for us code-play folk ;) http://www.chrome.com/racer
Re:Google I/O 2014 by helpful on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @05:55PM (#7476931)
It seems a lot of responses here were they didn't know they could scroll. I'm in the opposite camp. Didn't notice there was a play option and just scrolled :/
Re:Google I/O 2014 by pervycreeper on Thursday March 27, 2014 @02:05AM (#7478879)
Slightly OT, but how could you tell it was a higgs? What was the icosahedron representing?
Re:Google I/O 2014 by tyagis on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:50PM (#7476552)
I am starting to see a pattern of subtle hints about the demos this year.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by corresation on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @04:37PM (#7476446)
When Google originally started doing this it was essentially to open people's eyes to the capabilities of HTML. Lately, however, it has just been excessive. In this case it isn't even particularly clever: Click on stuff and stuff happens. If you had to actually align planets or build real molecules / atoms, then cool, but just clicking on highlighted things is not interesting.
Re:Google I/O 2014 by tikl1 on Thursday March 27, 2014 @01:06AM (#7478714)
I just rage quited because of this loop...