News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by jjoe on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:11AM (#7215912)
We're very happy with y'all here in Texas.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by cobralibre on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:40AM (#7216004)
Fellow Texan here. "Y'all" is plural, but certainly not formal.

I hasten to add that "y'all" is clearly not used exclusively by Texans.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by jychang on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:38AM (#7216182)
Y'all is singular. "All y'all" is plural.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by bane on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:42AM (#7216203)
If the group being spoken to is exceptionally large, or it's clearly a group made of smaller groups (a group of groups), in some places "Alls y'all" is used. It's fascinating to note it when you hear it.

edit also, if there's a possessive it gets pretty crazy, for example a tour guide, assembling several groups for a tour might say "Let's get together for alls y'all's tour".

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by kjs3 on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @02:09PM (#7219644)
Native of Georgia (US) here. We use "all y'all" as a possessive. I've never heard "alls y'all's" here, but have in the Southwest and thought it was linguistically slightly excessive. :-)
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by kendalk on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:52AM (#7216225)
Oklahoman here. We say "y'all" as plural. We also say "you all."
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by kjs3 on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @11:14PM (#7222445)
Y'all is most certainly plural where I'm from (Southeast US).
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by vacri on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:06AM (#7216071)
It confused me when I asked a native Texan something about what I should do next and she responded with "y'all could [foo]". But there's only one of me? I suppose that technically I am the 'all' of the 'you' that is being addressed?
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by bunderbunder on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:13AM (#7216102)
In some regional vernaculars, "y'all" is singular and "all y'all" is plural.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by groovy2shoes on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:27AM (#7216146)
Interesting. Here in North Carolina, "y'all" is generally plural, whereas "all y'all" is also plural but more emphatic, as in "I really do mean every last one of you", or sometimes simply to indicate a stronger emotional content, especially when angry.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by chiph on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @10:21AM (#7217982)
South Carolinian here that spent a lot of time in Raleigh & Charlotte and is now living in Austin. "y'all" can be both singular and plural, depending on the context. "All y'all" applies to larger groups (sometimes including people that aren't present), as well as with additional emphasis.

"All y'all come by for supper" meaning you and your close family. And maybe even some other people as well, if there's room at the table for them.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by thro2 on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @01:39AM (#7216193)
Sounds like a slippery slope.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by GFK_of_xmaspast on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:03PM (#7218629)
And now we're back in the "use the plural when talking to a single person to be formal" that started this whole thing.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by Nicholas_C on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @10:20AM (#7217973)
Native Texan here. I've never really heard it being used as a form of "you" and that just seems silly to me. "Y'all" is definitely plural.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by scarecrowbob on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:21AM (#7215942)
I'm gonna upvote that just for you being a Texan and all.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by scarecrowbob on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:23AM (#7215951)
Though, to be honest, I think that the point of the op is formal, and not plural, 2-nd person address.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by sabbatic13 on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:26AM (#7215968)
Unfortunately, y'all gets used as a singular pronoun as well.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by sien on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:45AM (#7216015)
Similarly in Australia we're happy with 'youse'.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by illumen on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @04:12AM (#7216637)
I wonder if a high percentage of illiteracy in each place coincides with a high amount of alternative language forms being used?

47% of Australians are functionally illiterate - http://www.abc.net.au/local/videos/2012/09/07/3585457.htm

Illiteracy in Texas (still ranked #1 in US?) - http://www.literacytexas.org/literacy_in_texas/facts_statist...

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by js2 on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:19AM (#7215937)
I thought in Texas it was all y'all.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by scarecrowbob on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:22AM (#7215946)
Not so much. That's farther east, generally speaking.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of “you”? by gruseom on Tuesday February 11, 2014 @12:48AM (#7216024)
It seems that where all y'all is used, you have the re-emergence of the distinction between the formal (y'all) and plural (all y'all). Which is pretty fascinating.