kjs3

It's a far better measure than "despite all the years of unfulfilled hype and promises we'll absolutely have a smorgasbord of performant RISC-V cores Real Soon Now". Single core performance down in the Intel Core range? Needs 96 cores to even be competitive on a handful of benchmarks that don't equal a modern users compute needs? The competition isn't sitting on their hands, and RISC-V hasn't delivered the performance it's fanbois have told us is 'inevitable'. Loongson has at least managed late-2010s levels of performance.

Maybe RISC-V will completely take over the embedded market. That's not a bad gig. High volume, tho slim margins, lot's of niches for lots of innovation (want to continue to go crazy with ISA extension? Not a big deal in the embedded world). But they're still selling billions of 8051s, ARM is ubiquitous but even they didn't take over that world, and I know how I would lay my bets there, too.

Yes, I would really love this as well. They make tri- and quad-color e-ink displays, but I've only ever seen the 'badge' size. I'd buy a full sized reader with just that right now.

Will they send a "strongly worded letter"? That's the best way to make sure such an incident never occurs again. /s

In any legal dispute involving them, Exhibit A will be "look at how they ran their SSL/TLS business". That won't go well.

  Recital 64: The controller should use all reasonable measures to verify the 
  identity of a data subject who requests access, in particular in the context
  of online services and online identifiers.