> sexually obscene; pornographic
"Do not #&$+ where you eat."
Seriously, a second mistress, who is unqualified?
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/11/11/nvidia-jensen-huang-affair-e...
I just put a large amount of money into Nvidia, and I am aghast.
You never, ever have intimate relationships with professional connections. Ever.
https://hyperallergic.com/nvidia-ceo-jensen-huangs-situation...
Prostotution is legal there. I never availed myself in this, but I saw what was available in the Provenza.
Cartagena is accustomed to this, but Medellin is not so much.
I am a follower of Kant, a formulation of his categorical imperative is that "we never treat people as a means, but always as ends in themselves."
I try not to touch people, because that is a big ask.
You have my deepest sympathy that your parents hadn't quite evolved to that level of civilisation to teach you the same. Life must be tough for your childhood in such primitive and vile family.
Your comment would have been fine, and even appropriate, had you stopped at the first sentence. What you wrote after that is much worse than the comment you're criticizing, and obviously a bannable offense.
I don't want to ban you, so if you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful. We've had to ask you this more than once before.
That's totally a joke people would make. Joking about nominative determinism happens all the time.
And nominative determinism is a dick move regardless of whether people do it or not.
I joked that she was a PRC intelligence asset because of what a perfect partner she was and came out of nowhere, which doubled as a subtle dig at her family having been supporters of the cultural revolution.