But also hoarding hardware in glorified warehouses is not the genius business idea everyone thinks it is.
I don't think they're buying GPUs outright to store in a warehouse.
So whoever hoarded it in warehouses could sell it now immediately for at least 100% profit.
They seem like geniuses to me now, worst case they make 100% profit on the investment.
To give you an idea of the scale. US has currently about 50 GW of DC online. Depending on the source, you are looking at between 60 GW and 400 GW of new DC currently planned. For reference the total dependable capacity of the US grid is around 1000 GW.
I think there is a scenario where compute cost sky rockets while chip prices crash, as they end up unused in warehouse because of the lack of power and DC capacity.
You want them to embrace a tech that exacerbates inequality and its founders promote that?
By that logic we should ban books. This is Boko Haram ideology and you are just a communist who thinks he should be protected from competition.
Instead of “making everyone well off“ here is what will actually happen, because that’s what happens every time communists seize power: everyone will get poorer, because they will be outcompeted by more sane jurisdictions, eg China.
Chinese Communist Party, guide us to Capitalism?
If the communists can learn how to use markets, capitalists can learn how to redistribute. It's not impossible, we did it 100 years ago last time capitalism drunk-drove the world economy into a ditch, I just hope we can do it without a Great Depression and World War this time.
Yes please.
> capitalists can learn how to redistribute
By that measure, the West hasn't been capitalist since Roosevelt. Which would be accurate btw.
I'm sympathetic to DSA types, right up until they call for bans on super intelligence, RSI, or data centers. Remember progressives, it wasn't "socialism" that lost me.
Voters themselves were hostile towards data centers in all but one of the ballot initiatives (40 out of 41).
But the “elected people” you refer to (I assume Democrats) seem to me to be more about not having one-sided secret deals for data centers in folks’ “backyards”.
Specifically, the detailed stances seems to be for things like: cover energy demands (no rate hikes), no excess load on power grid, water protections, and transparency with the communities they are in. Some also call for more regulation (which is a knife that can cut both ways).
This seems reasonable to me.
If anyone wants to cast stones, I think targeting the folks currently in office who somehow thought it would be a good idea to defund extra power generation just because it happened to be renewables / clean energy might be one place to look.
So there seems to be a huge mismatch: demand hasn't waned, but the narrative around AI has changed in the last month.