News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by amw-zero on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:04PM (#50433612)
But then you won't know how to efficiently use AI, so you'll still end up spending more money when you start using it, nullifying any of the micro-optimization you were trying to do in the first place.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by rogerrogerr on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:05PM (#50433633)
I wish "how to efficiently use AI" was a deep subject; it isn't. You point it at problems and they get solved. It's mega boring, and the main reason I'm looking to leave the industry.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by netrem on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:13PM (#50433700)
Overengineering it can also harm performance. When a new model comes out with a different system prompt, custom instructions can become a hindrance.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by amw-zero on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:01PM (#50434710)
I'm not seeing that in practice. It's another infinite space. We don't know what the best techniques are at all, and there are many many different ways to apply it.

What I can confidently tell you is writing a 2-sentence description of an application you want built does not work in any sense of the word. And, the difference between vibe coding and agentic engineering is vast.

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by marginalia_nu on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:06PM (#50433639)
Why do you have to personally invent how to effectively use AI? You can learn from other people's mistakes, wait for best practices to settle. Be Java.
Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by Jare on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:13PM (#50433703)
> Be Java.

Ok if this is the advice then I'm gonna look for a second opinion first. :)

More seriously: making any crap with AI is trivial and doesn't need learning. Making something better and more valuable than all the competitors *that have the same tools as you* is more involved, and relies 100% on knowing how to extract unique value from the tools. A part of that comes from your product/industry expertise (acquired before AI, much like your competitors), but unless you're a genius or in a greenfield, what will matter will be the other part where you have trained hard to be a better driver than your competition who just waited and watched a few youtubes.

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by gonzalohm on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:10PM (#50433680)
Aren't AI companies aiming at a level of AI that would basically be "do this app" and will take care of everything?

If not, what are they even doing that they keep burning through piles of cash?

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by latentsea on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:16PM (#50434816)
> But then you won't know how to efficiently use AI, so you'll still end up spending more money when you start using it, nullifying any of the micro-optimization you were trying to do in the first place.

Not really. Models eat harnesses. Once the new model drops it invalidates lots of harness engineering people have done, and invalidates things they have learnt about how to efficiently use AI. The better models get the less need there is to need to know how to use them efficiently. They're also getting better at helping you use them efficiently.

It's weird. It's like no matter what you do, it's all just a waste of time.

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by red-iron-pine on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @10:22AM (#50441670)
only way to win is not to play

or maybe double-down extra hard