News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Everything is an AI scam now by softwaredoug on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @04:29PM (#50371834)
You’d think if we convicted Elizabeth Holmes for defrauding investors, many AI grifters are doing far worse? What am I missing
Re:Everything is an AI scam now by Forgeties79 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @04:30PM (#50371847)
Large single target + a woman playing with powerful rich men’s wealth and egos vs. whack a mole with countless, faceless people using ChatGPT

If grifters weren’t allowed the entire YouTube economy would collapse. The tate-wannabes would be in shambles. It’d be awesome.

Re:Everything is an AI scam now by chneu on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @04:44PM (#50371987)
This country, and capitalism, have no issue taking down women. It's rather profitable to do so.
Re:Everything is an AI scam now by senordevnyc on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:09PM (#50372222)
This country, and capitalism, have no issue taking down women.

lmao. You know her male cofounder got more prison time than her, right?

Re:Everything is an AI scam now by amritananda on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:05PM (#50372689)
Not to mention according to the BOP tracker Holmes is at a minimum security camp (which I've heard described as being similar to living in military barracks - you could literally just walk away if you wanted to) while Balwani is at an actual low-security prison meant for e.g. drug dealers and sex offenders.
Re:Everything is an AI scam now by antonvs on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:31PM (#50372910)
You’re not wrong about the situation with women - Martha Stewart was another example, her main crime seems to have been “insider trading without political power”, since what she did is something that a majority of senators, congresspeople, and executive branchers - obviously including the president - have done at one time or another.

But Holmes was selling a medical product that was completely fraudulent, and that she knew was fraudulent. There’s a reason medical products are heavily regulated.

If you want to claim unfair targeting against her, I think you’d need to find a roughly equivalent example involving a man, otherwise it’s not really a meaningful comparison.