News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by Alien1Being on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:04AM (#50363417)
It is the Gimp of book management.

Calibre works amazingly well.

It looks amazingly bad.

Both are great examples of outsider design.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by piokoch on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:35AM (#50363653)
Frankly? Who care. Napster had even worst GUI, yet it has become popular as it just did the job people wanted.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by rithdmc on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:42AM (#50363711)
Did Napster have many competitors at the time?
Re:Kitty 0.50 by 63stack on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:04AM (#50363883)
Kaazaa, emule, dc++
Re:Kitty 0.50 by riffraff on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:14AM (#50363974)
Those came one or more years after Napster, when it was already wildly popular because it was the only tool that did that job.

Like calibre, I guess :)

Re:Kitty 0.50 by Lalabadie on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @09:40AM (#50366163)
The Kazaa people then used the same base to create Skype (which was "true" P2P for a long time). I'd say they've done pretty good.

Obligatory: I miss Rdio. That was them too.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by rithdmc on Thursday November 05, 2026 @10:31AM (#50380363)
They all came over a year or two later right?
Re:Kitty 0.50 by latexr on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:54AM (#50364348)
> Frankly? Who care.

Lots of people. It’s great that you don’t, really, but Calibre is very ugly¹ and I have no doubt that limits its adoption. Subconsciously, people associate ugly apps with unpolished or unfinished apps.

I don’t use Calibre (I rely instead on command-line and bespoke tools) but I do recommend it to less technical people and I always make it a point of saying “it’s very ugly but it does everything and does it correctly, it’s the gold standard for what you want to do” because I’m pretty sure if I didn’t add that disclaimer the people I recommend it to would think they downloaded the wrong thing or abandon it as soon they opened it.

¹ That’s just personal opinion, we don’t need to have a debate about that. If you find Calibre beautiful, more power to you.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by fn-mote on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:32AM (#50364690)
“I manage my Kindle reading list with home-made command line tools” is a very niche situation.

I’m impressed but also… that’s a lot of effort.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by latexr on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @10:14AM (#50366745)
> “I manage my Kindle reading list with home-made command line tools” is a very niche situation.

I don’t use a Kindle (it’s a Kobo, those are very hackable) and don’t use my tools to manage the reading list, I prefer to do that on device. But sure, I’m not claiming it’s for everyone, there’s a reason I recommend Calibre to other people. My needs are fairly minor, I don’t even use any of the popular alternative interfaces like KOReader.

> I’m impressed but also… that’s a lot of effort.

Not that much effort, and the tools have evolved as my habits did. I’ll give you one simple example of such a tool: I can select an EPUB and press a keyboard shortcut which actions it in Alfred to first convert it to to a Kobo EPUB with kepubify and then upload to Dropbox with rclone. I can then download it from the Kobo manually.

I had another which would take the URL of the frontmost browser tab, download and convert it to EPUB with pandoc, then it’d reuse the same kepubify and rclone steps. That one doesn’t work that well nowadays, with all the websites getting harder to access programatically due to all the LLM scraping.

Neither of those needs a lot of code, and I’m still relying on other tools for the heavy lifting. It’s just that for my specific personal needs, this is faster and more convenient than using Calibre.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by osener on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:58AM (#50363832)
What does that even mean. It is design produced by the user and maker of the app. If you hire a designer that's neither, doesn't that actually make them the outsider?
Re:Kitty 0.50 by latexr on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:40AM (#50364238)
> What does that even mean.

Outsider design? It means it’s designed by someone self-taught or not classically trained in the subject. It’s neither insult nor praise, it’s a classification, though often used as a way to express something as being unconventionally interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outsider_art

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outsider_music

> It is design produced by the user and maker of the app. If you hire a designer that's neither, doesn't that actually make them the outsider?

No, because “outsider” refers to “outside the world of design” not “outside the world of this product”.

> He's not making a traditional art form as someone who's untrained.

Your parent comment didn’t claim they were making art. But they are designing the app are are clearly untrained in design. Again, that’s not an insult. How many of us here are self-taught programmers?

> He's designing Calibre, and he's the most qualified person in the world in doing that.

That doesn’t necessarily follow. If that were the case there would be no designers, everyone would just do their thing. The point of learning design is to understand what works and why and how to apply it. It is perfectly valid for you to have a vision of what you want the thing to do but to need help in presenting it more effectively.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by osener on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:14AM (#50364527)
Outsider art, outsider music refer to art, and even in those practices a lot of celebrated artists are the ones that eschew the established norms.

But design is functional. Grows organically by needs of the user. If so many people swear by Calibre, it is well designed for calibre’s use case. It is not only about the aesthetic design trends. They don’t need to apply a coat of liquid glass and modern icon treatment to make it well designed.

This appeal to authority is why we end up with everything looking like Juicero of software. Shiny, the same components and pricing plan as everything else. But absolutely soulless and often user hostile.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by Geezus_42 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:19AM (#50364577)
> Outsider art, outsider music refer to art, and even in those practices a lot of celebrated artists are the ones that eschew the established norms.

I don't think many of those artists were celebrated during their lifetime, or at least not until the their form became more widely accepted in the mainstream.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by latexr on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:28AM (#50364659)
> Outsider art, outsider music refer to art, and even in those practices a lot of celebrated artists are the ones that eschew the established norms.

Which is what I said.

> If so many people swear by Calibre

There’s no true alternative. A lot of people use Calibre despite how it looks, because it does all the things. The world of messing with ebooks outside the vetted stores isn’t that big.

> It is not only about the aesthetic design trends.

I didn’t even so much as hint that. Please don’t straw man.

> They don’t need to apply a coat of liquid glass and modern icon treatment to make it well designed.

Again, no one said that. I personally dislike Liquid Glass.

> toolbox

Again, there’s nothing wrong with that nor have I claimed there is.

> This appeal to authority

There was no appeal to authority. You completely misunderstood the comment, fabricated an argument in your head and are fighting that.

Fucking hell, HN is tiring. Stop being so angry all the time, we’re not on opposing teams. Not every comment is a criticism or disagreement for you to rally against.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by osener on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:37AM (#50364728)
Sorry I made you feel like this. There are no shortage of “Calibre but well designed” tools, as long as Calibre has existed. I am just tired of hearing Calibre and other open source apps are badly designed as if that is an objective fact. When can we accept a design stands the test of time and maybe it is in fact well designed?
Re:Kitty 0.50 by tweetle_beetle on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @08:47AM (#50365447)
As far as I was aware, there definitely is a shortage of "Calibre, but well designed" tools. What are these tools?

There are lots of things that do bits of what Calibre does (Kavita, Librum, KOReader, Koodo, etc), but nothing comes close to replacing it.

Re:Kitty 0.50 by Geezus_42 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:10AM (#50364497)
Your point would make sense if hiring designers wasn't the mainstream.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by tasuki on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:41AM (#50364768)
Hiring designers isn't the mainstream for people who develop a thing for free in their spare time for everyone to use.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by shimman on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:16PM (#50372276)
Your point would make even more sense if you realized that not everyone cares about capitalist goals when developing software. Some people want software to work for everyone, not just those with money or means.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by Geezus_42 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @05:19AM (#50377437)
I also want software to work for anyone. I never said anything about capitalist goals. I pointed out that the person building calibre can still be considered an "outsider" in the art sense, since they are not part of the mainstream who hires designers. Work on your reading comprehension bud.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by shimman on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:31PM (#50387412)
No, you only want software to work in a specific way that requires more resources than necessary. Just because you don't understand the outcomes of your beliefs doesn't mean others do not.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by Geezus_42 on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:12AM (#50390457)
That is not at all what I said. You're making things up on your own.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by kar1181 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:24AM (#50364091)
So true. Main thing is both are still being built and used everyday though.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by asdfsa32 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:37AM (#50364226)
For the lack of a better functional alternative, not because it is the ideal.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by indymike on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @07:03AM (#50364422)
Sometimes functional is ideal.
Re:Kitty 0.50 by solyin on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @06:24PM (#50372852)
In the case of gim paint, Photoshop is RIGHT THERE, it just costs money, and who's got extra amounts of that lying around?