i am tired of seeing same patterns and designs on Internet. It is kind of frustration

Yet it will be worse when we aren't able to detect it as easily

what exactly will be worse once no qualitative difference is detectible?

No difference in presentation doesn't make presented slop content less sloppy.

By now I just want everything just to be black on white or white on black text and nothing else. Or better, just an md file.

And also real life.. there's no reason why a laundromat, barbershop and Japanese restaurant have posters that looks similar

Agree, all of them in same industry mostly have similar posters. My eyes keep ignoring them and focus on service quality of barbershop and restaurants.

You know, not everyone has taste etc to make visually appealing websites. Would you rather read extremely basic text ones?

I find well prompted AI makes nice looking websites. Are they better than some designer could do?

Probably not, are they better than a guy that hasn't done a minute of fronted work in 20+ years in the industry? Probably.

Is it content-free? I don't think so. Is it hard to read? I don't think so either. Is it incorrect? I hope it's not %))

Does it sound like a typical LLM-generated text? In many areas, it does. But why would I care? This is not expected to be a piece of literary art. Equally, the pictures illustrating it are not artistic masterpieces, and aren't expected to be. And even the letters in the text are not carefully handwritten by a human but machine-generated.

Get used to it, and get past it. It's not worth the attention.

Ok, buddy.

Indeed:

"RVA23 silicon has arrived. The industrial computer built on it has not."

"Until recently it lacked what industrial systems need. That has changed."

So tiresome...

"The silicon is here. The industrial computer isn't yet."

"An industrial computer has to do more: survive the control cabinet, talk to the field, and stay available for a decade or longer." Like what?

Do people think this sounds good? Maybe it does, but you and I are just tired from seeing it everywhere?

I've been wondering the same since the scandal that hit the French literary world a couple of months ago [0]. Until a journalist (anonymously) accused the author of having written his novel with AI, literary critics and fellow writers were fawning all over the book, and the book was set to grab most of this year's literary prizes.

Then people like you and me, who read AI prose all day long, went and read the book, and we all immediately knew the book was, at the very least, heavily AI-generated. For a few tragicomic months, people were in denial, going on TV to defend his book and defiantly proclaiming that "a machine could not have written this", only exposing their insulated ignorance.

Hence the question: do we dislike this style because we read it all day long? Was it originally pleasing (it probably arose out of RLHF), but then used excessively? All while famous French writers and critics had nothing but the highest praise for the book...

Note: after the author could not prove authorship, his editor officially declared that he had, indeed, used AI to write the book [0].

[0] https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence...