News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tidal AI Policy by bko on Monday June 29, 2026 @12:49PM (#48721638)
I think the flood is also due to people in general finding AI generated music passable.

I may be in the minority but I like AI generated music. Do you ever really like a song in the current moment and want one almost exactly like that? Mostly for background music. I like to listen to synthwave while working and since I may listen for 10-20h a week, I hear the same songs over and over. Maybe I should be more selective or curate my playlist, but it's just work. I would love a stream of AI generated music in a particular style I can work to.

Re:Tidal AI Policy by atrus on Monday June 29, 2026 @12:54PM (#48721730)
You see that a lot in AI (and honestly, other discussions) where people with differing requirements are talking past each other.

Some people are listening to music as an experience, internalizing lyrics, empathizing with the feeling and vibes of the artist. Others are just wanting something pop-y as background noise while they do work. They come together and since they're arguing for different needs, the whole thing turns into a mess.

Re:Tidal AI Policy by platevoltage on Monday June 29, 2026 @02:32PM (#48723239)
It's still silly. We have decades and decades of pop music, and really any kind of music you could possibly want. What AI SHOULD be used for is matching these people with some of the music made over the course of human history that they might like, not feeding them pig slop.
Re:Tidal AI Policy by JAlexoid on Monday June 29, 2026 @03:22PM (#48723870)
We have a lot of pop-slop, now it's AI slop.

There's a reason why a few artists persist through the decades, while others just fade into obscurity.(think of how long Madonna, Cher have been around)

Re:Tidal AI Policy by JAlexoid on Monday June 29, 2026 @03:19PM (#48723830)
AI generated music is good, the singing (vocals and lyrics) is typically very bad.

AI generated music is also not at all original. Which scares all of the "artists" who lack originality.

Re:Tidal AI Policy by mvdtnz on Monday June 29, 2026 @03:34PM (#48724010)
> AI generated music is good, the singing (vocals and lyrics) is typically very bad.

This is a musicaly illterate position. You only find the instruments passable because you're not familiar enough with music. You hear vocals and because you have a decent understanding of what a human should sound like you can tell how bad it sounds. Anyone with a musical ear hears the same thing of the horrible AI generated instrumentals.

Re:Tidal AI Policy by JAlexoid on Wednesday July 01, 2026 @09:01AM (#48746037)
We're talking about a layman. Not to mention that different genres have different quality of AI music.

I would easily recognize AI generated orchestra, while I can bet a lot of money that AI generated EDM is hard to distinguish from something created in a DAW

Re:Tidal AI Policy by paul7986 on Monday June 29, 2026 @03:40PM (#48724095)
Totally agree with Tidal (music SPAM needs to go away) and this coming from a huge lover of AI music. So much so, I only listen to my own AI music now and I'm not the only one per this Verge article https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/937059/n...

As a lifelong songwriter, using AI to produce my own melodies and lyrics lets me listen to the diary of my own life, which allows me to reminsce and realize my songs are the best songs ever for JUST me :). I dont subject others to them ... much.

Re:Tidal AI Policy by platevoltage on Monday June 29, 2026 @02:39PM (#48723322)
Just Carpenter Brut and Gunship alone collectively have over 6 hours of music.
Re:Tidal AI Policy by nekooooo on Monday June 29, 2026 @04:27PM (#48724718)
poolsuite.net

dozens if not hundreds of synthwave channels and internet radio stations. but sure, listen to your ai slop muzak.