Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by steve_adams_86 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @02:56PM
(#47521634)
It would be trivial to reroute power from the secondary systems to the forward shields anyway
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by steve_adams_86 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @06:12PM
(#47523976)
Only on the unoccupied decks!
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by tty456 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @11:26PM
(#47526332)
What about the brig?
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by brynnbee on Thursday March 26, 2026 @03:23PM
(#47534551)
It's just Wesley in there, no big
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by mrexroad on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @10:38PM
(#47526065)
Try reversing the polarity
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by malfist on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @04:35PM
(#47522832)
If it's built to federation specs, we even have redundancies for the redundancies.
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by mechanicalpulse on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @10:15PM
(#47525941)
None of it matters if the controls aren’t responding. You’ll know, too, because they make that sad static beepy noise like some sort of Tactile Control Panel ACKnowledgement failure.
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by ant6n on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @11:47PM
(#47526432)
Well, in a crunch I wouldn't like to be caught without a secondary backup.
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by throwup238 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @12:14AM
(#47526581)
I’m betting they sprung for the cheaper Cardassian ones without the redundancies. O’Brien is not going to be happy.
Re:Antimatter has been transported for the first time
by csdreamer7 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @02:54AM
(#47527360)
He does feel more comfortable having those Federation tertiary backups in case.
Considering all the weird encounters Star Fleet vessels encounter over the run of a TV series; who can blame him?