News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by imglorp on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @04:44PM (#47508962)
The marketers did this for 5G also, calling their product 5G before it was actually deployed, only because theirs came after 4G but wanted to ride the upcoming 5G buzz.

It seems marketing /depends/ on conflating terms and misleading consumers. Shakespeare might have gotten it wrong with his quip about lawyers.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/att-to-drop-misleading-...

Re:Arm AGI CPU by mort96 on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @05:46PM (#47509886)
There was soooo much intentional disinformation around 5G. Everyone who wanted to sell anything intentionally confused the >1Gbps millimeter wave line-of-sight kind of 5G with the "4G but with some changes to handle more devices connected to one tower" kind of 5G. I wonder how many bought a "5G phone" expecting millimeter wave but only got the slightly improved 4G.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by bee_rider on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @11:10PM (#47512775)
This is mostly the standard’s fault, right? Putting more conventional wavelengths and the mm stuff together in one standard was… a choice.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by phire on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @03:39AM (#47514435)
From a standards design perspective, there is nothing wrong with it. It's the same protocol running on two very different frequency bands. They co-exist and support each other.

The problem is how marketing interacted with it.

Re:Arm AGI CPU by ZiiS on Saturday March 28, 2026 @05:53AM (#47553125)
They should share a specification (I know this is correctly called a 'standard') but the should have been a separate logo for each non-interoperable group of useful features (a different concept also often called a 'standard'); as USB has proved.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by catlifeonmars on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @07:32AM (#47515949)
Wait til you search the term “6g”.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by sneak on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @09:56PM (#47512229)
Bill Hicks had some thoughts, too:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=GaD8y-CGhMw

Re:Arm AGI CPU by hnlmorg on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @05:30AM (#47515135)
It’s been a long long time since I’ve heard that name come up in conversation.

Thanks for the trip down memory lane.

Re:Arm AGI CPU by guerrilla on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @04:22AM (#47514688)
Yes, my wireless router has "5G WiFi" but only does 4G. I didn't have a choice about using it since it comes from the provider, but still stupid.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by catlifeonmars on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @07:34AM (#47515964)
What is 5G WiFi? Do you mean 5Ghz WiFi?
Re:Arm AGI CPU by guerrilla on Thursday April 02, 2026 @05:58AM (#47612236)
It's nothing. It's just made up deceptive marketing terms. That's my point.
Re:Arm AGI CPU by estimator7292 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @12:38PM (#47519730)
5G and 4G are not terms applied to WiFi. We have 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax and WiFi6/7

WiFi operates in the 2.4, 5, 6GHz bands, but those frequency bands are not used to differentiate WiFi standards because you can mix and match WiFi 6/7 on all three bands.

There are also more WiFi bands below 2.4 and above 6GHz, but they're not common worldwide.

Re:Arm AGI CPU by antonvs on Thursday March 26, 2026 @09:50PM (#47538215)
> 5G and 4G are not terms applied to WiFi.

Tell that to Netgear, AT&T and several other Wifi hub manufacturers.

The default SSIDs on many hubs are names like “NETGEAR23” and NETGEAR23-5G”.

Re:Arm AGI CPU by guerrilla on Thursday April 02, 2026 @05:57AM (#47612233)
I know that, but you misunderstand. This is a 4G model and WiFi router in one. The company that made it is pretending there's something called "5G WiFi" though.