News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Arm AGI CPU. Parent comment

Re:Arm AGI CPU by phire on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @03:39AM (#47514435)
From a standards design perspective, there is nothing wrong with it. It's the same protocol running on two very different frequency bands. They co-exist and support each other.

The problem is how marketing interacted with it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Arm AGI CPU by ZiiS on Saturday March 28, 2026 @05:53AM (#47553125)
They should share a specification (I know this is correctly called a 'standard') but the should have been a separate logo for each non-interoperable group of useful features (a different concept also often called a 'standard'); as USB has proved.
[ Parent | on HN ]