News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by JeremyNT on Monday February 16, 2026 @10:24AM (#47036180)
I feel like you could have correctly stated this a few months ago, but the way this is "solved" is by multiple agents that babysit each other and review their output - it's unreasonably effective.

You can get extremely good results assuming your spec is actually correct (and you're willing to chew through massive quantities of tokens / wait long enough).

Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by ldng on Monday February 16, 2026 @10:36AM (#47036332)
And unreasonably expensive unless you are Big Corp. Die startups, die. Welcome to our Cyberpunk overlords.
Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by whateveracct on Monday February 16, 2026 @12:17PM (#47037595)
Companies will just shift money from salaries to their Anthropic bill - what's the problem?
Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by oblio on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:07AM (#47045268)
Best not build any products that compete with Anthropic!
Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by JeremyNT on Monday February 16, 2026 @01:24PM (#47038335)
Or hey, the VCs can self-deal by funding new startups that buy bot time from AI firms the same VCs already fund.

No pesky developers siphoning away equity!

Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by nicoburns on Monday February 16, 2026 @01:04PM (#47038111)
> You can get extremely good results assuming your spec is actually correct

Is it ever the case that the spec is entirely correct (and without underspecified parts)? I thought the reason we write code is because it's much easier to express a spec as code than it is to get a similar level of precision in prose.

Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by JeremyNT on Monday February 16, 2026 @01:22PM (#47038299)
I think this is basically the only SWE-type job that exists beyond the (relatively near) future: finding the right spec and feeding it to the bots. And in this way I think even complete laypeople will be able to create software using the bots, but you'd still want somebody with a deeper understanding in this role for serious projects.

The bots even now can really help you identify technical problems / mistakes / gaps / bad assumptions, but there's no replacing "I know what the business wants/needs, and I know what makes my product manager happy, and I know what 'feels' good" type stuff.

Re:Anthropic tries to hide Claude's AI actions. Devs hate it by otabdeveloper4 on Monday February 16, 2026 @02:59PM (#47039531)
> finding the right spec and feeding it to the bots

Also known as "compiling source code".