ldng

I bet for a short golden age where AI will reap the low hanging fruit of easy (for a computer) cross-referencing and inference. And then a dark age with none interested in putting new ideas out in the field. Hopefully, I am wrong.

Internet Ad business has been like that for a long time with bot click & Co.

Now if we could get a Qwen-Image-Layered 2 also at 7B ... ^^

(Or does this model has those capabilities natively ?)

Comparing Apple and Oranges ? It is not an LLM.

Makes you wonder why exactly Nvidia bought them, right ?

So, in real life, steal, raise attack dogs and blackmail and tell me, are you going to be praised by society ?

Openai and Anthropic just behave like criminals. First they orchestrate the IP theft of the millennia, then they train the equivalent of attack pitbull and let one loose and finally they blackmail to achieve monopoly through regulation or else they'll unleash the dogs ...

We don't have a problem of missing regulation, we have a problem of actually applying existing law enforcement and make both Altman and Amodei accountable for their actions.

You are far from alone on that path and indeed I also wonder if it may be time to let it go.

There is a MAJOR difference between predictable generated machine code and Russian Roulette code generator.

Well they should rewrite their shitty sluggish new JS UI in Rust then.

What an amazing way to inflate token spending ! /s

But the thin is that de dev don't review the generated code ... because, surely, that's the reviewer's job ... right ? /s

We'll see, crash will tell.

Indeed, what could possibly go wrong ?

No, it illustrates the carelessness of the UK AI Security Institute.

They even admit it : "This incident should be interpreted with caution and nuance. To some degree, our evaluation design choices and specific configurations enabled the behaviour."

Ok, but the article is about etching the model, not a "whole bunch of systems". So far, I still don't if its actually doable or if it is just unsubstantiated speculation.

How ? Do LLMs actually "know' when they don't "know" ?

I am not shitting on the guy, I literally said : "sorry no offence to you personally". I am crossed with DDG that for sure.

And I said, many people have complained, here on HN about it, only to be met with the same damage control over and over.

But granted, I could have phrased all that differently. You're right.

For about the last to years I've seen the bubble effect creeping in. And, sorry no offence to you personally, to be blunt, I'm not interested in damage control.

When I make a generic search unrelated to a hobby I have and I get as top answer something about my hobby, it's a very red and very flashing red flag of bubble effect.

The nail in the coffin has happened this weekend when some un-asked for auto-correct prevented me from searching what I wanted. The moment a tool gets in the way (whatever the good intentions are), I drop the tool. And, no, most of the time DDG don't know better than me.

Several people have been calling your founder on this, here, me included, and have been ignored. DDG might not need early adopter anymore. Fine by me, I'll move on.

Sorry for the bluntness but the truth is you already lost my as a user.

You're reading that incorrectly. I disapprove of the bubble effect.

I specified I'm not interested in chabot because I'm looking for a search engine and some people tend to conflate the two. I prefer first hand information, hopefully filtered for spam and slop but not "tailored" by a bubble that is more often mistaken than not.

It's the bubble I have the most issue with. Second-guessing is annoying. This month is getting worst with unasked for auto-correct that, of course, is wrong and end up not allowing me to search exactly what I want because DDG supposedly "know better". It does not.

And that's exactly why I moved. And now they broke that trust.

Because I don't trust them anymore ?

Interesting. I'll give Ecosia/Qwant a go than as I'm not really interested in opting-out of a bubble.

Edit: hum, sadly, Qwant integration to Firefox seems to be broken at the moment.

Exactly. I don't like search engine second-guessing what I'm looking for, more often than not it's a miss.

Agents are the proof that LLMs Plateaued : you need the loop to get further.

What supplemental information is there ? I did not read much more than in the linked article.

Plus you can't say it's because Trump's terrible economics so safer to blame AI.

Let me guess, because you, yourself, are not an employee so you don't mind because it does not apply to you ?

It took a VERY VERY long time for these replacement products to appear.