Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by SV_BubbleTime on Sunday December 21, 2025 @01:57PM
(#46347220)
VPN is a trust exercise, but, I’m sure if Mullvlad isn’t the best out there, they’re far from the worst.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by charcircuit on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:09PM
(#46347350)
They are not the best because they no longer support port forwarding. Their IPs are low quality and get you flagged as suspicious.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by newdee on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:15PM
(#46347399)
Which VPN provider doesn’t have their addresses flagged? I know a few offer “residential” IP addresses (for quite the premium), but as I understand it, these are a bit of a grey area and are also usually shared, so usually just a matter of time until they’re banned or flagged as proxy/shared/anonymiser.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by charcircuit on Sunday December 21, 2025 @03:52PM
(#46348310)
The financial incentives for VPNs as they get bigger cause them to both put as many subscribers on the same IP as possible and to share IPs over the entire subscriber base. It's possible for a VPN to sacrifice profit to avoid being detected as easily.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by HNisCIS on Sunday December 21, 2025 @06:39PM
(#46349790)
Tbh between that and cgnat I'm kinda hoping that the entire ipv4 space gets sufficiently tainted that sites stop blocking by ip
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by edm0nd on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:34PM
(#46347580)
They had to disable port forwarding due to abuse and spam iirc.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by dr00tb on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:17PM
(#46347419)
Can recommend https://njal.la if you still need port forwarding.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by bossyTeacher on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:22PM
(#46347476)
how does it compare to mullvad?
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by KomoD on Sunday December 21, 2025 @03:39PM
(#46348205)
One reason not to choose Njalla is that they changed their legal entity without (to my knowledge) telling anyone. THat's a bit of a red flag for me.
They were incorporated as 1337 Services LLC in Nevis (the Caribbean island) and recently it suddenly changed to Njalla SRL in Costa Rica. Looks like some guy wrote a post about it where he contacted them, they said "internal restructuring, nothing to worry about" and refused to elaborate further.
I know Peter Sunde (of TPB) founded it but I don't know if it has changed hands now.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by wkat4242 on Monday December 22, 2025 @02:20AM
(#46352027)
Or proton
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by friend-monoid on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:15PM
(#46347409)
Are you expecting a public IPv4 from a VPN?
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by zrm on Sunday December 21, 2025 @04:00PM
(#46348383)
A VPN provider could easily support Port Control Protocol / NAT-PMP without giving each VPN client its own public IPv4.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by aaomidi on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:20PM
(#46347457)
Airvpn does it
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by pteraspidomorph on Sunday December 21, 2025 @03:13PM
(#46347982)
I'm happy Airvpn is rarely mentioned in mainstream vpn lists and don't typically mention them myself (sorry airvpn folks, but here's my apology) because I suspect its relative obscurity is in great part the reason it works so well. Not only reputation - it's technologically good too, supports all the payment methods, good prices, lots of exit points, no nonsense. I've been using them continuously for several years.
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by greatquux on Sunday December 21, 2025 @03:08PM
(#46347948)
Yep they are great! Wireguard support on Linux too
Re:Mullvad VPN: "This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt."
by Dylan16807 on Sunday December 21, 2025 @07:24PM
(#46350053)
Not a whole public IPv4, just one port on it (or a couple). And the public IP should change every reconnect.