Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by marssaxman on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @09:28PM
(#46053543)
While this is not an unreasonable way one could define "piracy", surely you must be aware that your definition is significantly more expansive than the one in common use?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by danpalmer on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @09:40PM
(#46053621)
What's the difference? Unless you take the common use of the term to mean peer to peer file sharing, which clearly isn't expansive enough (see pirate DVDs, pirate sports streaming, etc), then I'm not quite sure how it is a bad fit?
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday November 26, 2025 @04:19PM
(#46062441)
The common use means violation of copyright, specifically distribution rights.
Payment is not a good indicator. Tons of free content has no payment, and a good chunk of pirate content is paid for.