Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by hshdhdhehd on Monday November 03, 2025 @01:19AM
(#45796342)
Thats why I experienced 2 bars equals zero internet today?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by dawnerd on Monday November 03, 2025 @02:37AM
(#45796706)
Bars really don’t matter. You can have full bars and slow to no internet. You can have one bar but relatively decent internet. Honestly kind of wish the signal display would go away and instead show me when I lose internet.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by toast0 on Monday November 03, 2025 @03:34AM
(#45797024)
When you lose internet, you get a ! next to the bars (at least I have on my last few androids). Usually I also have no bars when I lose internet, but sometimes I've got coverage without data flow.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by dawnerd on Monday November 03, 2025 @03:52AM
(#45797110)
Wish Apple would do that. It’s kind of a guessing game.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by willis936 on Monday November 03, 2025 @05:01AM
(#45797466)
You can have full bars and no internet when jammed in a crowded space with full pipes. Just because the PHY is linked doesn't mean you have internet.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by smcin on Monday November 03, 2025 @04:51PM
(#45804887)
True, but brownout due to network congestion is not the complaint here.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by chipsrafferty on Monday November 03, 2025 @04:48PM
(#45804845)
You should but you don't always
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by pants2 on Monday November 03, 2025 @03:45AM
(#45797078)
Almost like it should just be a combo of realized ping + internet speed instead of signal strength
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by lxgr on Monday November 03, 2025 @11:48AM
(#45801143)
Yes, please!
And while we're at it: Just surface the fact that connectivity sucks to applications (maybe even at the socket layer, by just closing them if there's not been any forward progress for a certain time), rather than showing me loading screens that'll never go anywhere for minutes.
This would give apps that do have some offline caching the chance of falling back to that (looking at a certain green music streaming service here).
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by simscitizen on Monday November 03, 2025 @07:00PM
(#45805989)
It is surfaced to apps, but the "just detecting that connectivity sucks" heuristic turns out to be not all that easy to implement. There doesn't seem to be a better heuristic than "try and let the app decide if waited too long".
There are some comments here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/systemconfiguratio...
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by xfactorial on Monday November 03, 2025 @01:33AM
(#45796403)
That is literally what i am observing lately with my provider: i have 2 bars and yet i do not have internet, where as my gf, using the same iPhone model, with a different provider, having 2 bars, has perfect data connectivity.
Re:Simple trick to increase coverage: Lying to users about s...
by Cthulhu_ on Monday November 03, 2025 @05:40AM
(#45797690)
I build apps at the moment, in addition to the phone's network indicators you really should provide your user with visible and live feedback to indicate whether the servers are reachable because there's so many things that can break down in between. Also programming your app for offline-first is good unless it's critically important the information is either live or absent. We allow offline access by using React Query and storing its caches in user storage.