News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by darepublic on Friday October 24, 2025 @10:08AM (#45694830)
I understand the "need" for cheating but it does seem like overkill the way they cheated, at least as described. They've already got colluders, and then the auto shuffler reads the cards, and then they've ALSO got the contact lenses? Just some marked cards would have been sufficient. And then the rare time the fish catches up after being behind is your "let them win a hand and get traction". It just seems like they really went too far to control every part of the hand
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by yuliyp on Friday October 24, 2025 @11:10AM (#45695467)
Perhaps those were different iterations of the technique over time. Start with marking cards to identify face cards, then move on to x-ray table.
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by jimbokun on Friday October 24, 2025 @10:43AM (#45695159)
What's the increased risk of cheating more?

Once you're cheating and colluding you are in danger of going to jail, and it's not clear that more cheating makes it more likely to be caught.

Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by asdfasvea on Friday October 24, 2025 @11:37AM (#45695716)
How could more cheating avenues not equal a more likelihood of being caught?

Car analogy--I never had to take my 1976 Olds Cutlass in because the key fob got out of sync or because the touchscreen got fried or the electronic power steering module shorted or... or .. or

More points of failure = more failure.

Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by dghlsakjg on Friday October 24, 2025 @12:40PM (#45696357)
Is a 76 olds the car to use to make a point about reliability?
Re:Mind-boggling' poker fraud used X-ray tables, high-tech g... by cestith on Friday October 24, 2025 @02:59PM (#45697971)
Not regarding the paintjob, certainly.