Of course you disagree, you are not the one being targeted.

I wonder how long you would stand being impersonated in various situations. Or your parents. Or your significant other. Or your (adult) kids. Would you still tell them to their face there is "no violation"?

You're wrong, I would still disagree. In fact, you're welcome to make some fake nudes of me, my pictures aren't too hard to find.

Of you. But you dodge my question about people who aren't you but you care about (if there is any of the sort).

I answered that question in the first sentence of my previous comment...

Personality rights are a thing, publishing your likeness without your consent in particular in any commercial context is illegal in just about any jurisdiction on earth.

I meant from a moral perspective. I'm aware that it is illegal in some jurisdictions but this would almost certainly not be considered "commercial use" in the context of likeness (unless the author uses the generated picture in an ad, etc.).

If Grok is charging a fee to do this, then it's "commercial use".

I highly doubt so. Paid software like Photoshop has been used to generate fake pictures for ages and yet they are legal. It's how the generated pictures are used that matters.

i think the more this becomes normalised the less taboo it will become. people will no longer care about it

> people will no longer care about it

I wonder how Taylor Swift feels about it.

She feels exactly how management tells her to feel. If they could point to her liking it being good for her brand and business she would be all over it.

Why don't you think she has any agency of her own? She's a billionaire, I doubt she's letting her management tell her how to think and feel about her own body. Do you think Zuckerberg or Bezos let their management "feel exactly how their management tell them to feel"?

I’m sure Swift the Person has thoughts that come from a single source. Swift the Brand, is not that.

My reason for why I don’t think she has agency over her brand has more support than your thinking she does.

What are your feelings on revenge porn, peeping toms, sexual assault, rape, and pedophilia?

what's your feeling about thinking about a person while jerking off?

Are you trying to say that’s equivalent to providing a service that creates fake nude images of an uninvolved third party?

You keep typing “fake”, but I feel like you aren’t understanding it.

They are AI generated images of something that was never released as an actual photograph. People literally call things like this “deepfakes”.

I feel at this point like you’re some rapey pervert who just feels entitled to the bodies of other people.