Re:You might not need tmux
by aragilar on Friday August 01, 2025 @07:49AM
(#44755501)
Sadly after experimenting with a bunch of "modern" terminals I'm forced to consider that their primary audience is more interest in ricing than actually implementing the terminal commands (or connecting to anything other than their favourite linux box) and so I'm stuck with xterm as the only reliable terminal emulator that won't occasionally spew unreadable junk.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Have you tried Ghostty? Its creator has been pretty serious about getting everything right.
I tried it a few months ago and it didn’t even have a way to search terminal output.
Re:You might not need tmux
by metaltyphoon on Friday August 01, 2025 @10:42AM
(#44757502)
That's the most annoying part of ghostty at the moment. I have no idea why it isn't a priority :( https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189
Re:You might not need tmux
by tristan957 on Friday August 01, 2025 @02:36PM
(#44760673)
Because Mitchell doesn't use terminal search, and neither do most of the maintainers.
Re:You might not need tmux
by metaltyphoon on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:25PM
(#44761254)
How is this even possible? Just pipe result from a command into a file and open in vim and search it that way? Perhaps use Neovim's built in terminal where you can search at will? I find it hard to believe that "I don't ever search" is a thing.
He probably uses tmux which has features for all of those things, why should the terminal re-implement them?
Re:You might not need tmux
by metaltyphoon on Friday August 01, 2025 @09:21PM
(#44764187)
He gave an interview on YouTube, which contradicts this.
Well, I am perplexed then.
It does kinda sound like he's trying to reinvent X11.
I don't think I've ever intentionally used the scroll back search in iterm2 and deliberately disabled the shortcut for it because I kept triggering it by accident. I don't understand wanting or needing it, at all.
That's what pagers are for (e.g. less.)
Oh yes, using a new terminal emulator instead of one which has been around for decades. What could go wrong? It's creator has been vocal that it's nothing more than a side project
That’s underselling the community around it. Most subsystems have dedicated maintainers at this point, and it’s improving at a reasonable rate. It’s just new and new tools don’t have the full set of features of older tools.
I’m assuming based on your dismissal of people using a new terminal emulator instead of one which has been around for decades, that you don’t want any time or effort invested in new tools.
Re:You might not need tmux
by GuinansEyebrows on Friday August 01, 2025 @12:45PM
(#44759266)
ironically, the last time i tried it in my normal workflow, it refused to interpret certain escape sequences... to the terraform cli application. i couldn't finish a `terraform apply` - i'd type `y` and hit enter but it would just print `^M`.
I asked what test suite they used to ensure they had the correct behaviour, and they were fairly dismissive, so I'm not sure what you're basing that on. I think they're far more interested in a specific set of features than getting things right.
Or they have experience as open source maintainers, and don’t really answer questions that you can find out for yourself if you look at the github repo.
I did look, hence the question, and the response I got was sufficient to tell me what I needed to know.
And, actually having terminals crush. It is kind of absurd to have a terminal crush.
I've tried
Wezterm Ghoatty Ptyxis
First two had some frequent crushes, ptyxis is quiet reliable, but I felt it consumes too much memory for a terminal. But I feel it's a good terminal.
Though I wish I could get rid of the headerbar
Re:You might not need tmux
by Modified3019 on Friday August 01, 2025 @11:57AM
(#44758671)
What is “terminal crush”? I’ve not heard of this before.
I think he's referring to being married to or "crush" on the terminal you use
I'm assuming "crash"--it's a mild malapropism based on some varieties of English phonetics that I've seen before.
Oh, my bad he he, as other corrected
Re:You might not need tmux
by elzbardico on Friday August 01, 2025 @01:41PM
(#44759895)
you mean "crash"? But who I am to judge if you have a crush on a terminal, some of them are really beautiful in their minimalism. :-D
Ah, terminals ARE really nice, aren't they? Fast and efficient. Can't say that for too many apps.
Nevertheless, yeah, I meant crashing, All these years of gnome terminal, Tilix I never had them crashing.