I tried it a few months ago and it didn’t even have a way to search terminal output.

That's the most annoying part of ghostty at the moment. I have no idea why it isn't a priority :( https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189

Because Mitchell doesn't use terminal search, and neither do most of the maintainers.

How is this even possible? Just pipe result from a command into a file and open in vim and search it that way? Perhaps use Neovim's built in terminal where you can search at will? I find it hard to believe that "I don't ever search" is a thing.

He probably uses tmux which has features for all of those things, why should the terminal re-implement them?

He gave an interview on YouTube, which contradicts this.

https://youtu.be/o-qtso47ECk?si=6gWzcL9-69Njd8jq

Well, I am perplexed then.

It does kinda sound like he's trying to reinvent X11.

I don't think I've ever intentionally used the scroll back search in iterm2 and deliberately disabled the shortcut for it because I kept triggering it by accident. I don't understand wanting or needing it, at all.

That's what pagers are for (e.g. less.)

Oh yes, using a new terminal emulator instead of one which has been around for decades. What could go wrong? It's creator has been vocal that it's nothing more than a side project

That’s underselling the community around it. Most subsystems have dedicated maintainers at this point, and it’s improving at a reasonable rate. It’s just new and new tools don’t have the full set of features of older tools.

I’m assuming based on your dismissal of people using a new terminal emulator instead of one which has been around for decades, that you don’t want any time or effort invested in new tools.

ironically, the last time i tried it in my normal workflow, it refused to interpret certain escape sequences... to the terraform cli application. i couldn't finish a `terraform apply` - i'd type `y` and hit enter but it would just print `^M`.

I asked what test suite they used to ensure they had the correct behaviour, and they were fairly dismissive, so I'm not sure what you're basing that on. I think they're far more interested in a specific set of features than getting things right.

Or they have experience as open source maintainers, and don’t really answer questions that you can find out for yourself if you look at the github repo.

I did look, hence the question, and the response I got was sufficient to tell me what I needed to know.