You might not need tmux

Re:You might not need tmux by t_mahmood on Friday August 01, 2025 @11:21AM (#44758154)

And, actually having terminals crush. It is kind of absurd to have a terminal crush.

I've tried

Wezterm Ghoatty Ptyxis

First two had some frequent crushes, ptyxis is quiet reliable, but I felt it consumes too much memory for a terminal. But I feel it's a good terminal.

Though I wish I could get rid of the headerbar

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by Modified3019 on Friday August 01, 2025 @11:57AM (#44758671)

What is “terminal crush”? I’ve not heard of this before.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by rstupek on Friday August 01, 2025 @12:39PM (#44759201)

I think he's referring to being married to or "crush" on the terminal you use

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by partdavid on Friday August 01, 2025 @12:56PM (#44759379)

I'm assuming "crash"--it's a mild malapropism based on some varieties of English phonetics that I've seen before.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by t_mahmood on Friday August 01, 2025 @02:58PM (#44760924)

Oh, my bad he he, as other corrected

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by elzbardico on Friday August 01, 2025 @01:41PM (#44759895)

you mean "crash"? But who I am to judge if you have a crush on a terminal, some of them are really beautiful in their minimalism. :-D

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You might not need tmux by t_mahmood on Friday August 01, 2025 @03:08PM (#44761055)

Ah, terminals ARE really nice, aren't they? Fast and efficient. Can't say that for too many apps.

Nevertheless, yeah, I meant crashing, All these years of gnome terminal, Tilix I never had them crashing.

[ Parent | on HN ]