Which countries are using the military to enforce laws? Which countries are denying due process? In which countries is the executive branch ignoring court orders? In which countries is the executive branch claiming the powers of the legislative and judicial branches?

I have no doubt these countries exist, but I'm deeply skeptical that they are imitable.

> Which countries are using the military to enforce laws?

A number of European countries have military or paramilitary forces used for law enforcement when it comes to things such as quelling riots. Here is an example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Gendarmerie

That’s an organisation with a planned and legislated role. Sorting it out after the event is rather different.

> Which countries are using the military to enforce laws?

Cuba, the PRC, North Korea, Russia...

The military force is in response to riots.

And no country gives whatever it is you're calling due process to illegal immigrants. They deport them. Obama deported hundreds of thousands without any legal hearings.

How do you know they're illegal immigrants if not by means of due process?

I'm not from America, so just a casual observer. Isn't it possible to do a simple database check with some kind of ID? Or biometric? Where I'm from both are registered for ~everyone so it's fairly simple to do a check. The point being that if the database does not have the record they must have been an illegal?

No, the US does not have a database of citizens or a national ID. There's been long-standing resistance to such a thing, as part of the general American distrust of centralized government and what a tyrannical government could do with that information. That resistance has even been bipartisan, coming more from the left or right depending on who is in power. So there's no quick database check.

However, in practice, if you're a citizen, it's pretty easy to prove it. You'll be carrying forms of state-issued ID and you'll have a paper trail that makes it obvious. There's rarely much ambiguity over whether a particular person is here legally or illegally, as much as some might like to pretend there is.

Didn't ICE jail a legal student just the other day and refused to release him? I forget where but even the state's governor got involved.

Marcelo Gomes da Silva? His visa expired apparently.[1]

[1] https://apnews.com/article/marcelo-gomes-ice-massachusetts-a...

Hmm. Makes sense. Then couldn't the government have tapped into one of those processes, making it clear to everyone that the people that are being deported are illegal (or not) and saved themselves all the court cases?

Yes if their goal was to deport people who immigrated illegally. No because the goal is to remove due process. The next step is to deport citizens convicted of crimes.[1] Then prosecute political opponents.[2]

[1] https://www.npr.org/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366178/trump-deport-ja...

[2] https://www.npr.org/2024/10/21/nx-s1-5134924/trump-election-...

The US doesn't keep biometric data on every citizen or lawful resident, and the government can trivially lie or make a mistake about whether they did the database/ID check. This isn't a hypothetical, many legal residents and some citizens have been swept up, and without due process they have no ability to say, "I'm a legal resident" or "I'm a US citizen". They can just be shipped off to an El Salvadoran prison camp where the president can claim, "oops, I can't get them back because they're not in our jurisdiction any more".

> And no country gives whatever it is you're calling due process to illegal immigrants.

Virtually every European country gives due process, even in illegal immigration cases. And probably more importantly, the US Constitution requires due process even for cases of illegal immigration.

> Obama deported hundreds of thousands without any legal hearings

But they had due process. He didn't round people up in the streets without the ability to contest government claims of illegal immigration.

> And no country gives whatever it is you're calling due process to illegal immigrants.

The UK certainly does.

As does everyone else. That's how they determine whether they're illegal or not in the first place.

The military force is to gin up a conflict. Nothing about this current riot was not handleable by local police or the national guard.

The immigrants deported under Obama had due process.

You are just blatantly lying

Spain used the National Police Corps and the Civil Guard during the 2019 riots.

Not technically military, closer to National Guard.

350 thousand people were protesting in Barcelona at the time. How many people are protesting in LA? 1000?

I don't know.

So again then, why is the government not going after employers? Does the government only go after street level drug dealers but never anyone higher?

Uh, no. This is about illegal detainment of people (some of whom are citizens) by federal law enforcement. The overwhelming majority of citizens want a functioning immigration system (and a functioning criminal justice system). What I and others won't abide is law enforcement violating their oath and illegally detaining and deporting people.

Obeying illegal orders to attack American citizens on American soil is certainly something, but it isn't law enforcement.

If this were actually about law enforcement, we would have passed the bipartisan border protection / immigration bill that has been on the table for eons.