News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by simfree on Thursday October 24, 2024 @11:45PM (#41942043)
Firefox password sync just works. It's one of those things I never think about.

Watching friends and family struggle with bespoke, poorly integrated password managers makes me cringe and is one of the big reasons I enjoy the seamless experience of the built-in Firefox password manager.

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by danpalmer on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:17AM (#41942173)
Does it require a Firefox account? Does it only store them locally if you haven't signed in to Firefox? This is the sort of failure I've seen, where people think their passwords are synced but because they didn't sign in years ago it's actually not backed up at all. At least on Chrome you get reminded of that all the time on YouTube/Google search, etc.

I know for Safari all the sync is via iCloud meaning if you're not signed in it's locally stored and vulnerable in that way. Especially as many people can't/don't sign in to their own iCloud on work computers, or don't have a Mac.

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by notpushkin on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:25AM (#41942196)
Firefox reminds you a bunch of times, too. Would be nice if you could just link a new device via QR code (creating an account for you in the background).
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by codys on Friday October 25, 2024 @01:34AM (#41942501)
The original Firefox sync worked like this (with a unique code and pairing instead of an explicit account) (this is so on the nose I suspect you may know this).

This blog post goes over some of that history: https://blog.mozilla.org/services/2014/04/30/firefox-syncs-n...

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by callahad on Friday October 25, 2024 @01:58AM (#41942611)
Didn't expect to click on that link and end up on a blog post I wrote 10 years ago! The old Firefox Sync / PAKE stuff was fantastic for getting sync going between devices... but people wanted backup, not sync. I wonder if we'd do anything differently confronted with the same challenge today.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by g8oz on Friday October 25, 2024 @10:46AM (#41945776)
Hey I love the syncing
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by neobrain on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:05AM (#41944441)
> Does it require a Firefox account? Does it only store them locally if you haven't signed in to Firefox?

The passwords are available offline, so they are stored locally.

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by _fs on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:01AM (#41942120)
Does it have the ability to unlock with faceID on ios?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by phaerus_iconix on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:45AM (#41942292)
Yes it does.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by mikae1 on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:26AM (#41942198)
But does it work for non-website passwords like the PIN for the door at your workplace or the usernames and passwords for your computers?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by archermarks on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:36AM (#41942249)
Yes. You can add whatever passwords. It asks you for a URL but you can put anything in.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by gouggoug on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:51AM (#41942324)
> It asks you for a URL but you can put anything in.

Well, that’s kind of the problem isn’t it?

Yes, you can put bogus URLs, but it’s far from a great user experience

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by INTPenis on Friday October 25, 2024 @04:07AM (#41943246)
Technically maybe someone could make you navigate to that url in the future, through mitm or some sort of DNS poisoning, and autofill a form with your password and then auto submit it.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by RamRodification on Friday October 25, 2024 @03:47AM (#41943132)
door://businesstreet/23/A/front
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by globular-toast on Friday October 25, 2024 @04:10AM (#41943262)
Someone understands URLs! The URL will be 30 years old soon[0], and still many people don't know what it really is.

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1738

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by bowsamic on Friday October 25, 2024 @04:22AM (#41943331)
No end user understands URLs this way. Unless Firefox teaches them this, then this is nonsense
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by RamRodification on Friday October 25, 2024 @05:34AM (#41943639)
Yes, It's a joke. Sorry
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by eitland on Friday October 25, 2024 @07:50AM (#41944350)
Why not both?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by bowsamic on Friday October 25, 2024 @05:40AM (#41943660)
Is it? I thought you were being serious
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by RamRodification on Friday October 25, 2024 @05:46AM (#41943685)
Yes, it's a joke. Sorry.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by bowsamic on Friday October 25, 2024 @06:20AM (#41943872)
Why, though? Isn't it actually a good suggestion?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by nutrie on Friday October 25, 2024 @07:46AM (#41944319)
Agree! And it's funny.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by tverrbjelke on Friday October 25, 2024 @09:48AM (#41945252)
Where is the joke? I don't get it!
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by dbolgheroni on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:09AM (#41944466)
Not supported. It can't be anything.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by nox101 on Friday October 25, 2024 @01:42AM (#41942530)
it just works for websites. it does not "just work" for apps where as the platform ones do or have a chance to work with apps.

Kind of hope regulation will force apple/google/ms to allow iterations for 3rd parties to integrate with the os but on the other hand that will open a host of issues

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by joshvm on Friday October 25, 2024 @03:33AM (#41943056)
It does on iOS, but I believe the onus is on the app developer to enable the autofill feature in the form, or at least make sure that the app hints to iOS that it can be filled with a password. I'm making that assumption because there are lots of apps which don't trigger the native Apple password manager either (which is a lousy user experience). However, if one works then both do. The UI offers a choice of password manager and Face ID works to unlock it.

I use both. Apple's manager supports OTP generation which is nice, but on desktop websites, Firefox is often more convenient.

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by phs318u on Friday October 25, 2024 @07:19AM (#41944165)
I use the Strongbox app on iOS [0] and the KeepassXC app my Linux laptop. The passwords.kdbx file sits on my Onedrive, which the Strongbox app can access. On Linux I use a Onedrive client [0] that I use to sync several folders within my home folder. Strongbox supports both Keepass and pwSafe database formats. It also integrates well with iOS, with autofill supported (also supports Yubikey unlock and Apple Watch unlock).

[0] https://apps.apple.com/app/strongbox-password-manager/id8972...

[1] https://abraunegg.github.io/

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by BodyCulture on Friday October 25, 2024 @11:37AM (#41946302)
This discussion is about an open source password manager. I wonder why you are recommending a closed source software? Are you aware that many people prefer open source for security software for a reason?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by KeePassium on Sunday October 27, 2024 @06:06PM (#41966058)
I think most Strongbox users did not notice it turned proprietary. It's not like Strongbox advertised the change :)

Context: https://github.com/strongbox-password-safe/Strongbox/issues/...

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by phs318u on Monday October 28, 2024 @09:49PM (#41978565)
Correct. I did not realise this and am disappointed, having paid a pretty penny for the lifetime license. Reading the github thread, the surreptitious way they changed things is a bit of a dick move.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by delfinom on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:41AM (#41944679)
Yep, it's the same problem on Android. Some app developers go full asshole with the password text boxes. There was one electric utility here that I lambasted hard and they finally fixed their form which not only didn't trigger the password manager, it literally blocked all pasting.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by monocularvision on Friday October 25, 2024 @01:35PM (#41947520)
iOS already has all of the API required to integrate a password manager with the OS. Third party password managers can already integrate with both browsers and apps to provide passwords and password generation
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by ClassyJacket on Friday October 25, 2024 @01:49AM (#41942558)
Can Firefox password manager work in other apps on Android?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by attendant3446 on Friday October 25, 2024 @04:57AM (#41943489)
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by kome on Friday October 25, 2024 @05:33AM (#41943636)
yes and it's perfect. firefox (with ublock) are really the best experience on android.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by miki123211 on Friday October 25, 2024 @02:26AM (#41942742)
Firefox sync made the criminal sin of implementing end-to-end encryption, enabling it by default, and being insufficiently clear to people that their passwords are lost forever when they forget the master password.

This provides a really terrible UX to "normal" users. I woulnd't recommend that option to anybody who doesn't already know what E2E is and what tradeoffs it has.

Google's implementation is a lot better in that regard, at least they offer plenty of avenues for account recovery.

Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by bandrami on Friday October 25, 2024 @03:29AM (#41943034)
Presumably the passwords themselves have recovery/reset procedures? I can't think of a good reason to add another risk surface to a password manager given that
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by KPGv2 on Friday October 25, 2024 @09:22AM (#41945008)
Can you identify the password managers that do not implement end-to-end encryption so I can avoid them forever?
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by Nathanba on Friday October 25, 2024 @06:41AM (#41943976)
that's not my experience, I've lost bookmarks due to firefox sync multiple times.
Re:Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3 by jorvi on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:16AM (#41944491)
That is such a laughable statement. 1Password has incredible UI/UX. Even has e-mail masking with Fastmail. And auto-enters TOTPs, for the less-important one’s you feel comfortable saving in your password manager.