I do not understand why people choose someone who says stuff like this as their partner.
Besides your parent mentioned relatives as well. You don't choose those
Now all of the sudden you are a full time in home aide for your former partner.
As for why the person with the problems doesn't leave they don't want to have to spend a few months/years as a contributing partner to trick someone into caring for them again.
I cannot see this device actually coming to market in the US without rigorous studies demonstrating efficacy. (No idea how strict Australia is…)
The article is nothing more than a fundraising pitch. There is no product on the market yet.
To label it "abuse" immediately is modern, but not necessarily the most beneficial perspective if you want to grow with each other. You may also not always be in the position to choose who you interact with (e.g. relatives). Then you can still work on why (and how) you would care about _their_ problem, and not make it yours. Seems to be a confusion here about who has the "condition"/problem?
These products give false hope and are triggering for people susceptible for it which leads to abuse.
https://time.com/6262891/psychology-terms-misused-gaslightin...
How are you reading my comment as something where I make you doubt your perception? Can we not simply disagree, and share our different perspectives? Can we not hold different opinions about things, even concurrently, in our minds? I can unfold, and explain my position more, if you're interested. This is a place of discussion, after all.
I can easily picture this:
"concerned relative / partner"> You could be much better if only you tried this <insert name of magic cure / device>
person with condition> I have researched this, these things don't work, it is a waste of time and money.
"concerned relative / partner"> No, you just don't want to get better! I am really losing patience with you. Why don't you want to get help!?