I’ve always wondered that too. A lot of people will claim that “it’s their right” to not be recognized by surveillance and that’s why they use those covers, but seems a lot more likely that they don’t want take responsibility if they get in an accident that they can slip out of without being identified.

They're also great for running tolls.

I don't feel great about toll roads, personally, but I do feel that if you're using a license plate contraption to dodge tolls, your car should be crushed into a cube while you watch.

I think a lot of drivers view speeding and extending yellow lights as a bit of a cat and mouse game. As Carlin once said “Cop didn’t see it? I didn’t do it.”

Red light and speed cameras give police too much advantage in this “game” so they seek to take their own advantage.

I now have a Flock camera at both ends of my street. There is no way for me to come or go from my own house without the government having a record of it.

Unfortunately installing a smoke cover on my plate and waiting to get pulled over and issued a ticket is the only real way to kick off a 4th amendment challenge.

Spraypaint on the fixed-position camera lenses

Assuming you have a mobile device on you, that was already the case, just from location data from ATT/Verizon/Tmobile towers.

That requires a warrant (I'm very familiar with the process to request data from cell carriers). ALPR can be queried at any time because they are government owned cameras.

After Snowden and stuff like this, I assume if the government (at least federal) really wants it, they can procure it. Plus, the location data is probably saved so it’s just a matter of querying a specific phone number to see the whole history.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/16/20696222/att-location-dat...

> The suit stems from recent investigations into how AT&T and other wireless carriers share the sensitive data. A New York Times article last year found that law enforcement has used the data to track phones without a court order. In another investigation, published earlier this year, Motherboard was able to pay a bounty hunter $300 to track the location of a phone using the data. Several lawmakers were quick to criticize the companies’ policies following the Motherboard report.

>Several lawmakers were quick to criticize the companies’ policies following the Motherboard report.

You'd think, being lawmakers, they might be able to think of a more effective method to stop the behavior.

But no, apparently nothing can be done. Move along, nothing to see here.

Privacy is a spectrum. The “they already have all my information” seems like avoidance of a complex topic. Just because some people hand over all of their information to social media apps doesn’t mean we should tolerate even more intrusions into our privacy.

...Or... Do as teenagers and other mis^H^H^H privacy valuing, god fearing, concerned citizens have done.

Go "lose" them.

You are already being tracked by your cell phone pings, how is this any different?

You're assuming some things there, which may or may not be true for this person.

Even as a person that doesn't carry a cell phone, it's statistically likely that I'm still trackable (beyond just license plates).

Based on what?

e.g. Gait analysis.

Is that in widespread use in your area?

At most Target and WalMart locations, yes.

k. Sounds like if you're not carrying a mobile phone, you'd have to go out of your way to be tracked then. ;)

Some people will cleverly glue a leaf over 50, 60 or even 80% of the number. How did it get there? I don't know. Must be nature's fault. I'm so sorry officer.

Better yet, there are electromagnetic covers that allow you to drop the "leaf" while you're being pulled over for plausible deniability.

Lot of premeditation there

At least they have plates. I see cars driving plate-free in southern CA on a normal basis.