News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by bitmasher9 on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:19PM (#39661252)
Who is FT for, compared to other premium news outlets in the United States?

In the recent years I’ve been shopping around a news subscription, trying to avoid clickbait and thought bubbles. I don’t think I understand their target audience, even after reading the entire interview.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by wolverine876 on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:13PM (#39661708)
Its perspective and focus is business, and is European. That can make it a good complement to leading US news sources such as the NYT.

FT is, IMHO, the most intellectually sophisticated daily newspaper in the world, ahead of the NYT. FT columnists are just about the only ones I see anywhere that have intellectual honesty and also sophistication that makes them worth reading. (In other publications, IMHO opinion columns of every political stripe are an exercise in spinning news to favor their 'constituency', and are transparently misleading to someone who is otherwise well-informed.)

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by pja on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:38PM (#39661954)
People who care more about finance & economic analysis than they do about signalling political affiliation. There’s strong overlap with the WSJ in the USA I would imagine, except the WSJ is notoriously pro-Republican, whereas the FT has supported various UK parties across the political spectrum & the FT has a more internationalist focus.

They also really care about their Arts with a capital A reporting.

If you want a more eclectic approach to financial reporting, the FTAlphaville blog at ft.com/alphaville is free (registration signup required) & often well worth reading whether you read the main paper or not.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by jxf on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:22PM (#39661281)
It's basically WSJ with a somewhat more global perspective, and Euro-centric instead of US-centric.
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by Andrex on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:26PM (#39661317)
In my anecdotal experience, they're usually the first to scoop big Japanese business stories. (Some kind of Nikkei -> FT pipeline?)

Edit-

> It’s been owned by the Japanese company Nikkei, Inc. — an employee-owned company that publishes The Nikkei newspaper — since 2015.

Okay that makes sense now, haha.

Nikkei is employee-owned?! I need to look into this more!

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by alephnerd on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:43PM (#39661996)
> Nikkei is employee-owned?! I need to look into this more!

It's a Kabushiki gaisha (株式会社).

They aren't "employee-owned" in the progressive western sense (that's actually a "Cooperative") - it's just a joint stock company similar to McKinsey where employees can partake in limited profit sharing.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by Andrex on Monday March 11, 2024 @12:50AM (#39665001)
I'd love to adopt that myself, wonder if there's any good reading in English beyond the Wikipedia article...
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by walthamstow on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:46PM (#39661481)
And much softer, more centrist politics. WSJ is every bit a Murdoch paper
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by ghaff on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:54PM (#39661550)
The op-ed pages were pretty conservative even pre-Murdoch. The FT is a lot like the WSJ but, as someone else commented, more global in perspective and with a more centrist editorial angle. (Probably more in line with The Economist but maybe even more so.)
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by AdamN on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:40PM (#39661965)
Writing quality and critical thinking are double that of WSJ though.
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by gnicholas on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:36PM (#39661926)
> trying to avoid clickbait and thought bubbles

Check out Tangle — it's really good for this purpose.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by _dain_ on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:46PM (#39661484)
Sir Humphrey Appleby : Didn't you read the Financial Times this morning?

Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Never do.

Sir Humphrey Appleby : Well, you're a banker. Surely you read the Financial Times?

Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Can't understand it. Full of economic theory.

Sir Humphrey Appleby : Why do you buy it?

Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Oh, you know, it's part of the uniform. Took me 30 years to understand Keynes' economics. Then when I'd just cottoned on, everyone started getting hooked on these new monetarist ideas, you know, "I Want To Be Free" by Milton Shulman.

Sir Humphrey Appleby : Milton Friedman.

Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Why are they all called Milton? Anyway, I've only got as far as Milton Keynes.

Sir Humphrey Appleby : Maynard Keynes.

Sir Desmond Glazebrook : I'm sure there's a Milton Keynes.

Sir Humphrey Appleby : Yes, there is, but it's...

[Humphrey gives up]

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by ElvisTrout on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:50PM (#39661515)
Such a great show. So much of it still resonates
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by jonfromsf on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:16PM (#39661741)
What show is this?
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by Tomte on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:19PM (#39661762)
"Yes, Minister!" And "Yes, Prime Minister!"

And don‘t forget:

Sir Humphrey : The only way to understand the Press is to remember that they pander to their readers' prejudices.

Jim Hacker : Don't tell me about the Press. I know exactly who reads the papers. The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country; The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country; The Times is read by the people who actually do run the country; The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country; The Financial Times is read by people who own the country; The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country; and The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is.

Sir Humphrey : Oh, and Prime Minister, what about the people who read The Sun?

Bernard Woolley : Sun readers don't care who runs the country as long as she's got big tits.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by Tomte on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:08PM (#39661665)
> I'm sure there's a Milton Keynes.

I‘ve watched the series, and had no idea there‘s a city of that name!

How… why does it look like a given name and family name?

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by pja on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:43PM (#39662000)
Weirdly, the village the town was built around had that name originally: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middleton,_Milton_Keynes

Milton is a contraction of Middleton & Keynes was from the Norman de Cahaines family. There are a few other X Keynes dotted around the UK, all presumably on lands gifted to the de Cahaines family after the Norman conquest.

Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by jjgreen on Sunday March 10, 2024 @03:15PM (#39661724)
It's not a city in the conventional sense, more a collection of roundabouts without a soul. Never try to hitch-hike near Milton Keynes.
Re:The FT's chief executive on AI, "loyalist" readers, and i... by nescioquid on Sunday March 10, 2024 @02:39PM (#39661423)
One of the major sections on the front page is call "How to Spend It".