I’ve also had it backfire when my doctors office calls and they don’t use the same number that I called them from.
Negatives so far:
1. Relay costs money for continued use
2. Not every site supports a Relay email with the default domain or phone number (it is a VOIP number I think)
3. I am not sure what will happen to my HME emails if I ever stop using iOS / iCloud
4. My single Relay support request was not responded to in a useful way
5. I still have a ton of accounts that predate my usage of these services
6. Sometimes when a service is really important or I am dealing with a human being I will just give my direct info to try to make sure things work smoothly.
I bet a Relay or HME compromise would be an interesting thing from a hacker’s perspective. But I still like the services.
This is my question too. I've always thought something like you describe would be a pretty good, fairly practical approach to phone/text spammers just guessing numbers in valid area codes. Yet I never hear the FCC and other 'powers that be' talking about this kind of approach. They only seem to focus on ways of stopping spam at the source or network edge, which seems like a potentially intractable problem. Conversely, approaches which make it impractical to reach targets seem like they would be nearly impossible to circumvent.
Yes, there are downsides in eventually displacing the 10-digit perma-number space but those could be mitigated by keeping the old number space but allowing users to quarantine inbound 10-digit comms that aren't already in their 10-digit address book (or don't have caller ID).
Me too. Even "We updated our T&Cs" is too many.
I went on an account deleting spree:
* accounts where guest checkouts are an option: eBay, Mouser, bandcamp, booking.com
* accounts of once-used online stores
* old email accounts
* Amazon, Airtasker, Uber, frequent flyer, ...
I'm down to ~100 passwords in my password manager which is still too many, but good enough.
1) This will be massively resisted by the current oligopoly of Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook. Eg, you could run a simulated Android phone, but licences prevent you from installing the google play store etc on it. And it's even worse with Apple.
2) how to prevent it from degenerating into another monopoly/oligopoly.
Otherwise, I call back when I am available.
Some companies, like my dentist's office, are finally adapting and providing ways for their employees to text if there's no answer. I wish the FCC/phone cos would add some kind of 'return code' to callers who are blocked by this setting which indicates "This number only accepts calls from numbers in its phone book."
As an aside, a few months back I dropped a new email address on the net as a mailto: link and it hasn't received a single spam email yet. I think maybe scraping for emails is dead.
What can we do about this? With e-mail, we can create temp inboxes and throw them away.
What about phone? Is there an IPV6 for phone where we could have billions of throwaway numbers and use them as we see fit? Introduce a new country code that has 32 digit phone numbers and if you don’t accept those numbers, you don’t get our business?
At this point all of my personal, business emails, and phone numbers have been bought and sold a million times, and there’s no recourse or penalty for people spamming them. What can we do about this? It’s oppressive.