News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by xlii on Thursday February 08, 2024 @02:44AM (#39299391)
As far as I know there aren’t any sports which are completely safe and without side effects. Sport can ruin your joints (eg. running), spine (eg. weightlifting) and cause plethora of other health issues (anecdotally I know many people who got serious injuries from while leisurely playing team games).

Usually there’s net gain from those activities, and what sport one practices vastly depends on preference and I’d rather encourage people to get hit in the head in controlled environment versus growing roots in the chair.

As a fan of practicing fighting sports I find such drug a great addition to all the other protection amateur can have.

Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by stavros on Thursday February 08, 2024 @03:41AM (#39299719)
Swimming?
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by ntlve on Thursday February 08, 2024 @04:12AM (#39299912)
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by lupusreal on Thursday February 08, 2024 @06:07AM (#39300602)
> The traditional view that swimmers naturally gravitate toward swimming because of preexisting respiratory disorders has been challenged

Lolwut. Anybody who could believe that has never been a swimmer. Of course aspirating drops of pool water, and the chlorinated air lingering above pools, is going to be a lung problem. Why in the world would anybody with preexisting respiratory issues gravitate towards swimming? That's ludicrous.

> The traditional explanation for this higher prevalence rate is one of selection bias. The suggestion that swimming is a more suitable activity compared to both cycling and running in asthmatics5 is not surprising. For example, the hydrostatic compression effect of water can reduce the effort required to generate expiratory flow,

Dumbest thing I've ever read.

Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by rob74 on Thursday February 08, 2024 @04:59AM (#39300201)
Cycling is better for the joints than running. Unfortunately, bicycles are so damned effective that you have to cycle for a lot longer to burn the same amount of calories as when running...
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by doubled112 on Thursday February 08, 2024 @08:36AM (#39301728)
All my effort is transformed into forward motion. This is awful!
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by Taylor_OD on Thursday February 08, 2024 @11:55AM (#39304300)
Isnt it fairly common for cyclist to get seriously injured in other ways though? Most serious cyclists I know have had at least 1 seemingly major accident with a car. And I live in a city that has a pretty significant bike lanes/routes distribution.
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by PeterStuer on Thursday February 08, 2024 @06:02AM (#39300576)
It might also be we'll greenlight sports that have more head impact. There is definetly an audience for it, and now it will be just as (un)safe as before.
Re:Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat ... by lotsofpulp on Thursday February 08, 2024 @06:49AM (#39300860)
I prefer joint damage from running or back pain rather than expose those around me to the effects of brain damage.

Also, there are ways to run and weight lift (mostly just doing overdo it) that result in zero or near zero damage, whereas there are no ways to have your brain impact your skull with zero damage.