A gov agency or a known non-profit org coming up with it would have been better.

What3Words is an interesting idea, but the lack of locality and propriety nature of the codes makes me doubtful of using it for anything important.

I prefer the pluscodes introduced by Google as it is open source, useful offline, conveys locality between codes, and doesn’t hinge on the use of English.

https://maps.google.com/pluscodes/

I made something similar that has locality https://wherewords.id but that sometimes gets criticised. Some people believe that not having close positions be similar makes it less likely to make mistakes. Personally I'm skeptical about this, but it's certainly an argument that gets made.

I’ve heard that argument. I’m also skeptical about its weight compared to the benefits of locality. When what3words says it, I feel like it’s a salespitch as to why we should use their proprietary solution.

I think your checkmoji solves that problem in its entirety more elegantly. Would a fifth word make it error correcting rather than error detecting?

I did look at error correction - it'd be cool to have e.g. a any 4 from 5 words scheme, but for all the schemes I know, you'd need a good few more words than that to make it work.

I actually have come round really to thinking that a fifth word is probably a better approach than the emoji, although the emoji is more fun. Problem with emojis is that not all of them are easy to describe, and I think audio/speech rather visual is the key here.

Each word for my word list is 12 bits of information, so for a check word, it could have 3 bits for error checking each of the location words. which would certainly let me highlight which word was wrong, and may even enable me to suggest words that might correct it.

So I'd been thinking about something fancy like Shamir's secret sharing or some other threshold scheme, but actually, an xor check word is still really good - not only does it check, but if you know that only a single word was wrong and which it was, it can recover that word, or if you don't know which word but are confident it was only one, then you can narrow it down to just 4 possible locations, which will probably be good enough to identify the actual location most of the time.

Rather than long/lat, I love the concept of using Zooko’s triangle for a geospatial problem, such as:

  - human meaningful
  - decentralized
  - secure

However, w3w's isn't that. It is a centralized system which is actively enforced and it isn't secure.

There is actually quite a lot of critics of w3w, such as: https://cybergibbons.com/security-2/why-what3words-is-not-su...

Is What3Words a for profit company? Is it a good idea to base solutions on it? What value does this company brings in long run?

Not sure I want to use what seems like a fully-closed standard for something as frequent as sharing locations when open alternatives exist.

What3Words has been discussed dozens of times on HN, but the most relevant one is probably this analysis of the algorithm and the properties of the generated codes, as well as its companion piece:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27015046

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27058271

This company/app pops up on HN with some regularity, and attracts a fair amount of criticism:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37359256

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27350975

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27058271

It's business practices seem distasteful, several legal threats against competitors and critics, heavy covert "submarine" advertising (i.e. ads masquerading as news), and apparently unexplained popularity among policy-makers despite criticism from those on the front line (e.g. emergency services). Technical criticism centres on the fact that it's algorithm is not as good as it could be, hence risking lives, and is not open. Several alternatives exist, some of which the creators claim address these technical issues:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20970664

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31829267

I've no horse in this race, but frankly what3words seems a bad choice and an unpleasant organisation.

Edit to add links to reported issues and legal actions:

https://archive.is/6KVvL

https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/30/what3words-legal-threat-wh...

http://web.archive.org/web/20210430005537/https://twitter.co...

I dislike my location forms a phrase with a negative connotation.

Have you considered moving?

one of the features is that the spot a couple of metres away will have an entirely different set of words

When I made a location to word system I ended up having to spend a huge amount of time on the word list to try to remove words that tend to combine negatively. Partly because of that (but also because I went slightly more accurate than w3w and with a hierarchical encoding) I needed 4 words per location.

Still, I think it's a nearly impossible task.

I have an old and unfinished article [1] that uses geohash / quadtiles to implement the same thing.

If your goal isn't "every location on Earth", you have a smaller bounding box (like a country or "all of Europe") and this will result in the squares being more precise, or the identifiers or word lists being shorter. Could be worth the trade-off depending on the requirements.

[1]: https://www.gkbrk.com/wiki/Quadtiles-full/#encoding-coordina...

I wish this was more popular, with huge buildings addresses are not enough to deliver packages.

"Our opinion is that the proprietary W3W serivce is unhelpful and dangerous."

https://w3w.me.ss/ What 3 Words is a Mess

---

Personally I think the *idea* is great and is actually useful but the closed and internet only nature of this service is troubling and the behaviour of the company doesn't seem that positive. There are better solutions which run with the same idea. This company is VC backed and is using (it seems to me) all of their funding for marketing.

The better solutions don't have vc backing and no millions to spend on marketing.

Ah, the investor cash incinerator that is what3words!

Didn’t realize the history of the company prior, apologies.