News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by jtbayly on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:12AM (#39027898)
I disagree. The majority of the problems that I run into with self-checkout are related to not being able to buy items I picked up off the shelf like Mucinex or children's cough syrup or alcohol without getting an employee to check me out... at self checkout.

What's the point of "self" checkout if somebody is required—not by failure of the system but by rules—to come help me several times during the process?

Edit: at least with alcohol I know it’s coming. But it feels like every time I try to use self-checkout I’m foiled by surprise rules about particular items.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by MetaWhirledPeas on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:51AM (#39028493)
> What's the point of "self" checkout if somebody is required—not by failure of the system but by rules—to come help me several times during the process?

In my nearby Walmart they have a dozen or more self-checkout stations which only require a few staff in total. Most people don't need assistance.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by Izkata on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:58AM (#39028574)
Yeah, mine has 1 person overlooking 8 self-checkouts, and most of the time they're standing there doing nothing. I've only needed help like 5 times in several years, when the scale messed up.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by toyg on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @10:20AM (#39028896)
This seems easily fixed: just ask the consumer to show a driver license or other accepted ID, with some software validating whether it is legit. It will still be slower than a regular cashier judging your full beard and receding earline, but it would remove most human oversight.

Obviously there is a risk of illegally selling items to minors with fake documents, but I think that's fixable too. Already, in my local UK supermarket there are cameras on each checkout station, which I guess go to some bored reviewer; so you could just alert the guy "hey, customer X gave us a valid license" and assume that he'll react if he can't see a realistic amount of wrinkles.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by stronglikedan on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @11:11AM (#39029641)
Because people will then bitch and moan about how they're being recorded and their PI is being captured. The former is likely already happening, but people would still complain since it would be apparent. Both issues would be ephemeral if it's a human checking it.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by toyg on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @11:30AM (#39029923)
As I mentioned, we're already being recorded, so that's not much of an objection.

On PI, I agree that there is a qualitative difference between a cashier and a machine if you assume, as most people do, that the cashier will not remember private details. This can be fixed with industry-wide agreements to not store such data, in the same way as merchants don't store your full credit card details. You could even allow people to bypass the check if a valid identity is registered against their store-issued fidelity card.

Honestly, the only hard problem is localization. At the moment you can sell more or less the same automated till to UK supermarkets, US supermarkets, or EU supermarkets; but document-checking code will have to be heavily localized. Still, EU driving licenses are already similar on the entire continent, and that's quite a critical mass one could hit. I would be surprised if manufacturers weren't already developing this feature.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by ProllyInfamous on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @06:39PM (#39035223)
I use my US Passport for restricted-age item purchases (or ID at a bar), simply because it is not trackable and does not list my location/residence upon it.

Although I'm way beyond the point of caring about demographic profiling, I still don't want my home address to be available to everybody dealing with a simple purchase (although this perspective is probably greatly atypical on account of being a survivor of CSA).

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by gremlinunderway on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @07:15PM (#39035588)
it's not "bitching and moaning" to be concerned about the over collection and exploitation of surveillance capitalism.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by mjbeswick on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @11:24AM (#39029837)
This is more a issue with the current legislation rather than a technical one.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by jtbayly on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @01:59PM (#39031869)
But it was the store that decided to pretend I could self-checkout when I actually can't.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by jrwoodruff on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @10:00AM (#39028605)
Definitely a yes-and scenario here. I was a cashier, I'm good at finding and scanning bar codes and PLU lookups. I was a damn fast cashier. That's impossible in a self checkout. And then you get carded for a can of spray paint, and the one attendant for 8 machines has three people with blinking lights. On top of that, most of these self-checkouts are not designed to handle a full cart of groceries, but also why do I want to do the work of ringing up and bagging a full cart of groceries by myself?

For the most part, in practice there's little or no advantage for me, the consumer with a cart full of groceries.

One exception was 2003-era Martins in Virginia - Walk in, grab a cart that had bags attached to the front, grab a portable scan gun from it's charging dock. Scan and bag as you shop, dock the gun to the checkout register, show the attendant my id if needed, pay, and I'm done. No unloading and reloading the cart, no fiddling with plu lookups, fumbling with bags, etc. It was actually glorious, but relies on trusting your customers. Corporate stores seem to trust me even less than I trust them.

I'm somewhat ok with these things as a secondary 10-items-or-less option. But for the love of god staff enough cashiers to handle the grocery-shopping-Sunday crowds.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by johnmaguire on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @01:10PM (#39031272)
> Walk in, grab a cart that had bags attached to the front, grab a portable scan gun from it's charging dock. Scan and bag as you shop, dock the gun to the checkout register, show the attendant my id if needed, pay, and I'm done.

They were doing this in a few Michigan Krogers within the last few years. I think they ended the program though.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by magnuznilzzon on Thursday January 18, 2024 @02:51PM (#39046705)
That's what we have in Sweden. It is really nice, unless you get a check on leaving the store.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by Slamidan on Friday January 19, 2024 @02:31PM (#39059938)
You haven't seen many of the slow cashiers at walmart then.

I was a fast cashier as a teenager but its no longer a job for teenagers in many places, its broken people barely there.

The fast check out is far more than 8 machines in half decent areas, maybe double that and I can get out of there in record time.

I'd rather handle it myself than stand in line.

High trust scan and bag won't work in a low trust diverse society, let alone one where some groups are now entitled to theft.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by PhasmaFelis on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:56AM (#39028544)
My favorite is when the system says "help is on the way" and then very obviously does nothing whatsoever to notify the attendant. I have to catch their eye myself every single time.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by chankstein38 on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @10:15AM (#39028822)
This happened to me at the store last night! I tried to weigh something and the scale was mad so it locked up the whole process (dialog on the screen saying "Scale needs reset. Help is on the way!" and no ability to scan the rest of my stuff) then just sat there. I turned to the attendant and said "Oh it didn't even tell me you needed help"

Like wtf. At the very least let me continue scanning the rest of my groceries so I can be done once this person helps me instead of still just 2 scans in..

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by BobaFloutist on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:57AM (#39043320)
I think the light above you changes to blinking red, which they're expected to notice on their own but often don't.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by d1sxeyes on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @01:23PM (#39031437)
I always gamble and scan any alcohol or age restricted items first. About half of the time, it throws an alert and flashes but lets me continue scanning, it just won’t let me complete and pay until someone has come over and approved.

For some reason though, some idiot designer who never actually thought about how these would be used in reality, decided to make it so that the other half of the time it immediately stops all scanning until someone comes to fix it.

In the first case, basically I waste no time. In the second, I lose however long it takes for the cashier to come.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by pcthrowaway on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @05:15PM (#39034322)
If you scan the alcohol first, you can then move over to another checkout and proceed with the rest of your items if you need to wait for assistance for the alcohol
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by d1sxeyes on Thursday January 18, 2024 @07:10AM (#39040770)
Thanks for the tip—never tried it, but it sounds solid!
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by jon889 on Thursday January 18, 2024 @08:01AM (#39041157)
Why don't you just scan the alcohol last then?
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by kevincox on Thursday January 18, 2024 @08:12AM (#39041245)
Because you still need to wait for the attendant to come. But you have no chance of scanning other items in parallel. (Assuming you don't know if this store will block scanning)

It is always optimal to scan these first. You have two cases:

Blocking: scan 1 + wait for attendant + scan rest

Non-blocking: scan 1 + max( wait for attendant, scan rest)

The first case is never shorter than the second case.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by throw1234651234 on Thursday January 18, 2024 @08:47AM (#39041609)
^ This post is just in case you forgot you were on hacker news.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by d1sxeyes on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:23AM (#39042818)
I agree it's a beautifully crafted response, and have nothing to add, it's exactly what my point was.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by bluescrn on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @04:09PM (#39033489)
The first hurdle with some self checkouts is before you even scan an item: Bags!

If you've brought your own bag and it weighs more than the mass of a few protons, the system assumes you're trying to steal something, and a human has to intervene before you can even get started.

And then they have to come back almost immediately to deal with age-restricted items or other glitches.

Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by mr_toad on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:42PM (#39036908)
God forbid you have more than one bag, because that totally confuses the system.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by kevincox on Thursday January 18, 2024 @08:13AM (#39041250)
Or that not all of your bags fit on the scale.
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by pimlottc on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:17AM (#39042705)
One workaround is to delay bagging (in your own bags) until after checkout, when you can just ignore its complaints. But the downside is having to awkwardly tetris your scanned items around the stupid plastic bag holders that take up half the bagging area...
Re:The failure of self-checkout technology by themadturk on Thursday January 18, 2024 @07:10PM (#39049875)
Oh my gosh, this is the bane of my shopping existence. Fred Meyer (Kroger) self scan registers are absolutely henpecking, pushy nannies. Did you put a bag on the scale? Did you put another bag on the scale? Please put your item in the bagging area. Please take all your purchased items. Over and over.