Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by olejorgenb on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:52PM
(#38292902)
Does this entail a 30% cut to Apple/Google?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by bilal4hmed on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:53PM
(#38292924)
https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360031949872-Do...
Easy google , but no it doesn't
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by aendruk on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:51PM
(#38293683)
#cut
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by aendruk on Friday November 17, 2023 @01:51AM
(#38300378)
Itβs the missing URL fragment.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by smolyeet on Thursday November 16, 2023 @05:14PM
(#38296358)
Does it matter. 70% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by squeaky-clean on Thursday November 16, 2023 @06:04PM
(#38296924)
Because this isn't the only one way to donate, and if it were subject to the 30% cut, most people would want to know they could spend a couple extra hours steps for 30% additional impact on their donation.
Very few people are going "No apple pay? No donation."
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by thaumasiotes on Thursday November 16, 2023 @09:32PM
(#38298623)
> if it were subject to the 30% cut, most people would want to know they could spend a couple extra hours steps for 30% additional impact on their donation.
43% additional impact.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive
by yreg on Thursday November 16, 2023 @06:09PM
(#38296974)
Of course it does, if there would be both 70% and 100% options to donate.