News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by olejorgenb on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:52PM (#38292902)
Does this entail a 30% cut to Apple/Google?
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by bilal4hmed on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:53PM (#38292924)
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by aendruk on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:51PM (#38293683)

  #cut
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by aendruk on Friday November 17, 2023 @01:51AM (#38300378)
It’s the missing URL fragment.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by smolyeet on Thursday November 16, 2023 @05:14PM (#38296358)
Does it matter. 70% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by squeaky-clean on Thursday November 16, 2023 @06:04PM (#38296924)
Because this isn't the only one way to donate, and if it were subject to the 30% cut, most people would want to know they could spend a couple extra hours steps for 30% additional impact on their donation.

Very few people are going "No apple pay? No donation."

Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by thaumasiotes on Thursday November 16, 2023 @09:32PM (#38298623)
> if it were subject to the 30% cut, most people would want to know they could spend a couple extra hours steps for 30% additional impact on their donation.

43% additional impact.

Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by yreg on Thursday November 16, 2023 @06:09PM (#38296974)
Of course it does, if there would be both 70% and 100% options to donate.
Re:Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive by byhemechi on Friday November 17, 2023 @01:34AM (#38300267)