News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:28AM (#38163855)
Normally I would be very much in support of this as I never really liked money becoming more concentrated among the few. But given how great (sarcasm) of a job California is doing as a government I think I'd rather just end the California government then end some tax deal.

Seriously. This state has become such a shit place to live it doesn't deserve anymore taxes.

Actually maybe this deal will make apple move to Texas. It must be some sort of elaborate plan by those extreme geniuses in Sacramento. Make sf great again by pushing apple out.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by lokar on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:34AM (#38163931)
I live in California and I think both state and local gov do a good job. The people are competent and nice and the results are pretty good.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by wysewun on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:49AM (#38164143)
Thanks for saying that. Completely agree. Lignins perfect but for some reason California gets overly negative perceptions
[dead]
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by jeffbee on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:02AM (#38164339)
Children often need to be protected from their own parents and this fact is broadly accepted by Californians, which is why the people express via their legislature their disdain for reactionary ideas from red states.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by VirusNewbie on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:05AM (#38164378)
Being in tech, personally things are going well but CoL has skyrocketed and I worry about future generations.

My neighborhood is filled with wealthy foreigners who don’t work, but simply bought a nice house on OC, sometimes as a third or fourth house.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:23AM (#38164649)
So do I. Not only do I live here but I grew up here. Roughly 40 years. I respectfully disagree with you.

With all the homeless people, housing crisis and companies and people moving out of California largely because of government policies I'd say the government is doing a bad job.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by lokar on Monday November 06, 2023 @04:11PM (#38169074)
Land use policy is the main driver for cost of living and homelessness. It has little to do with state gov policy (if anything state level policy is focused on fixing the problems over the objections of small cities) and it has nothing to do with execution by state agencies. Housing is not expensive because the gov is somehow incompetent.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by ClumsyPilot on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:35AM (#38163954)
The way states in USA compete with each other by giving corporations infinite tax breaks is super toxic. Seems if you are big enough you never have to pay tax, but if you are a regular joe opening a nail salon, bend over
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by dboreham on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:57AM (#38164267)
Countries do it too. Looking at you, Ireland.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by robertlagrant on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:16AM (#38164539)
It's not toxic. Competition is the only factor that makes things better, or at least stops them getting worse.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by gwright on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:53AM (#38165063)
I think the competition argument is stronger when considering competition between states. What seems more towards the toxic side is when within a state some businesses get tax breaks and others don't based on lobbying effort and not based on some broader policy that is neutral towards specific businesses.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by robertlagrant on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @03:58AM (#38174683)
I agree with that, but it's difficult to say what cities should or shouldn't be able to enact. They do have different requirements to their region, and you wouldn't want e.g. a minimum wage law that might be appropriate for a city to destroy employability in the rest of the state.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @09:38AM (#38177221)
Simple - bespoke deals. You cant jusy offer a deal to Microsoft for example, you have tk offer the same deal/tax breaks to everyone who writes software.

If Microsoft doesnt need to pay taxes, then I shouldn't have to either. Or we all pay.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by kjkjadksj on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:34AM (#38164778)
Its at every level of government. Suburbs fighting other suburbs to give a huge tax break to a potential office where the workers have the off chance of spending some sales taxes buying a cup of coffee in the city. Usually the workers don’t even live in the suburb where they work so they aren’t paying into all those larger tax pools, merely being a burden on the road system. Then when the tax break starts to expire the company extorts the government to maintain it or they simply leave.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by leovander on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:37AM (#38163979)
> This state has become such a shit place to live

> Make sf great again by pushing apple out.

So the current status of SF must mean the whole state is like that? You started off the sarcastic note but switched to saying seriously, thanks for the sweeping statement.

> Actually maybe this deal will make apple move to Texas.

Eh, people leave for no individual income tax then get hit by the even higher property taxes.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by Covzire on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:13AM (#38164484)
Quick napkin math based on simple google searches:

Most tech workers will be paying 9.3% in CA State Income tax, let's assume they move to Texas with a $150k job. That's $13,950 fewer taxes paid on income to CA.

Moving to Texas they'll pay about an average $2263 more in property Taxes to TX. Probably a bit more realistically so let's say $4000 since they'll probably be buying property that's above the average price. That's still around a $10k/year raise, with lower cost of living and lower crime, and that's assuming they didn't negotiate a raise which is unlikely.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by thebradbain on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:32AM (#38164754)
As a Texan who moved and bought a home IN California, you’re forgetting about CA Prop 13 (which has its own giant set of problems)— in California, property taxes are not re-assessed after the purchase of the home. In Texas, they are every year _at market rate_. There was a cap introduced in 2022, but it’s still a cap of 10%/year. In many high demand city neighborhoods, you are indeed seeing property taxes grow at 8-10% year.

As far as the $2263-4000 difference in property tax the first year, where are you getting that? Texas’ property rate is about 2.12% of market value, forever (it can be more or less, depending on local programs and school districts, but is usually around there) California’s is 0.77%-1.07% the year you buy and is essentially frozen forever. So a $500k house in TX (which is _no longer_ enough for an in-demand Austin or Dallas neighborhood) will often carry the tax tag of a $1m CA home. An $700-1m house in TX (which _is_ where a home in an in demand Dallas neighborhood begins to start) carries roughly the tax burden of a $1.4-2m CA home.

That’s a lot more than people expect! And your payment will be increasing, sometimes significantly, forever!

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by jeffbee on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:19AM (#38164580)
Inability of online weirdos to understand marginal tax rates: example ++N.

The California state income tax on a gross of $150k would be $10730, not $13950. Furthermore, the deductions come off the top marginal rate, so if you are taking the standard deduction, maxing out your 401(k) contributions etc knock several thousand dollars off that figure.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by Covzire on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:37AM (#38164816)
Fair enough but that calculus only gets better for moving the higher the salary is, $150k was just a starting point and I believe most experienced devs in the bay area make a lot more then that, are likely to have families in need of stable communities and their spouse's income might double the reason to move, if they have one.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by jeffbee on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:48AM (#38164999)
A 2-income family with 1-2 experienced devs working at major Bay Area companies could easily make over a million. But that only means they are rich as hell, it doesn't mean they are middle class. Median income in Santa Clara county is $140k so $150k was already a bit high as a starting point for middle class experience.

I won't argue that California isn't squeezing out lower incomes. That much is clear. But you're overestimating what that income is. Lower income families leave California because of housing costs, not because of income taxes. The median California household owes < $1000/yr in state income taxes.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by doug_durham on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:49AM (#38164145)
Someone must have read the priming chapter in "Thinking Fast and Slow", and is trying to apply it to California politics. Repeating the same line over and over on any forum they can find to repeat the same drivel. I'm quite happy with the California government.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by rayiner on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:02AM (#38164336)
California is a shitty state for normal middle class people on many objective measures. It has some of the worst schools in the country, outperforming only Deep South states and Oklahoma and West Virginia. It has the highest cost of living adjusted poverty rate in the country: https://calmatters.org/commentary/2023/11/lower-california-h.... It has net domestic out migration, meaning that more people are leaving instead of coming in. Despite all that, it also has the highest tax burden of any state.

Yes, people talk about California a lot, but only because it’s such a clear A/B test result. It went from being a prosperous red state to being a dysfunctional blue state within a single generation.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:21AM (#38164608)
Never read the book. So your response is not only incorrect but I have no clue about what you're talking about.

A better response is to spell out your disagreement so that I can understand it without having to read a book.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by dboreham on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:56AM (#38164244)
It's a tactic used by spin meisters in other states to influence people who have probably never been to California. "Look over there at the liberals, see what a mess they've made in their own state".
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by rpmisms on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:25AM (#38164679)
I visited California and immediately saw a lot of homeless penises. The spin meisters prepared me correctly.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:22AM (#38164620)
I live in San Francisco. I've also lived in LA. For roughly all 40 years of my life.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by xwdv on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:49AM (#38164152)
Yup. It’s a shit state now, I used to live up in Northern California for a while. Proposals for the 51st state of Jefferson have been gaining popularity again. I’d love to see it happen as it would probably get me to move back to that region, but not under the current governance.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by webkike on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:59AM (#38164289)
What does SF have to do with Cupertino?

You think that ending this deal will make Apple move to Texas? Lol, fat chance, the people that work for Apple are among the very few that can actually afford to live in and enjoy the Bay Area

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:26AM (#38164683)
I grew up in Cupertino. Cupertino and SF are part of the Bay area. Pretty similar issues.

It's worse in SF, but you can still see those RV caravans behind the Cupertino target. It's the same housing crisis happening across the bay.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by sashank_1509 on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:18AM (#38164568)
All the I love living in California and state government is doing a great job folks, let’s make an honest review of the sunshine state:

1. Homelessness: 6 of the 10 cities with largest homeless population are in Cali. We’ve all been to SF, last time I was there a homeless person literally opened his pants and shit in front of a family restaurant (we all had to leave). So it’s probably the worst in this state compared to all states in US.

2. Housing market: Easily the Bay Area is the worst in the US, probably worst in the entire world to be honest. Entirely self inflicted.

3. Crime: it is NOT NORMAL to have to leave your windows and trunks open when you park to stop criminals from breaking your cars. For the brief period I lived in Seattle, I realized people can just park a car and leave it like that in Seattle, while in sf I’m perpetually paranoid.

For this level of government service we have to deal with the highest taxes seen in this country and plans to consistently increase taxes. A bad joke, if Apple ran the government they’d do a better job tomorrow.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by bcrosby95 on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:28AM (#38164703)
1. Numbers-wise, this is largely a problem with #2. Most homeless aren't the sidewalk shitting variety. In general, California cities don't round up and kick out their homeless. I never saw sidewalk shitting homeless when I lived in SF, but my understanding is it's gotten worse since I moved out. I live in a suburb of LA and have never seen sidewalk shit down here, unless it was deposited by a dog.

2. This is largely a city-level problem. The state of California is trying to solve it. The cities are NIMBYs and always want someone else to house all the people.

3. This sounds like an SF problem. Again, I don't live there anymore. Keep in mind that less than 3% of the population of California lives in SF.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by corethree on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:39AM (#38164847)
Original poster here. Lived 10 years in LA and grew up in the bay.

You're right sf is worse.

LA used to be better. Less homeless people. Its largely getting worse and going in the same direction as sf.

It won't ever be as bad as sf because la is simply not dense enough. However the underlying problems are all there and it's getting worse. Santa Monica used to be much nicer. SF is the direction LA is heading towards.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by mikeg8 on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:22AM (#38164633)
The state is massive. Your review can be summarized to the Bay Area or other major metro areas. Saying the entire state sucks because some large progressive cities are having issues found all over our country is a very weak argument.
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by rpmisms on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:25AM (#38164667)
The majority of the population lives in those metro areas. Seems dark to say it affects most Californians.

Source: former NY state resident, the shit flowed downhill from the city, and we all suffered.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by jonathankoren on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:42AM (#38164896)
Well one and two and directly connected. Anyway on a per capita basis, DC has the worst homeless problem.

Crime is not an issue. Seriously. It’s not. It’s still at historic lows. Stop pearl clutching. Regardless, the SFPD (and cops in general) do not stop crime. Decades of blank checks, and nothing changes except more lawsuits. Fuck the cops.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by kuchenbecker on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:52AM (#38165056)
There are 4 lights.

In all seriousness, if people think it's a problem telling them "it's all in their head" isn't an effective argument.

Dismissing legitimate concerns with abstract (to them) statistics will only drive away the people you most want to reach. The statistics are made of millions of individual perspectives.

Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by jonathankoren on Monday November 06, 2023 @12:17PM (#38165429)
Maybe you’d be more effective if you didn’t chime in with schoolmarm finger wagging about how we have to just accept absolute propaganda, ol’ Mx The-World-Is-Both-Flat-And-Round
Re:California wants to end Cupertino's tax deal with Apple by yieldcrv on Monday November 06, 2023 @11:51AM (#38165027)
anybody wealthy with 5 minutes of asset planning can avoid california taxes

thats why they’re not really leaving

buy $10mm worth of 30 year US treasuries today and make $500,000/yr, only paying federal income tax on that

its really not that hard.

(core inflation is lower than the treasury rates right now, and for things that rise faster in sure you’ll figure out how to buy orange juice.)

and entrepreneurs have so many deductions against their income its insane, only high earning wage workers have the issue but think their situation just gets worse as they get richer when thats not really the case