Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by HDThoreaun on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @06:29PM
(#38006562)
Fair enough. Not familiar with SF bus system but the bus system where I live, which is considered quite good I think, has each bus line 1/2 mile apart from each other. Almost no one lives directly along a route so there's an extra 1/8 mile average walk just to get to the route, not a stop on it. Fine by me but a lot of people don't seem capable of that for whatever reason. Combine that with the bus not actually going to where you're trying to get and I can see why people aren't huge fans.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by lozenge on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @03:33AM
(#38010221)
The reason is usually that they need a car for some journey, once they have paid that fixed cost, they may as well use it for more journeys.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by ytpete on Tuesday October 24, 2023 @10:06PM
(#38008300)
All these calculations are only true if your destination is on the road the bus runs along. Since not every road has a bus line, you also usually have to walk multiple blocks perpendicular _away_ from the bus line in addition to some of the distance between stops.
Re:California suspends GM Cruise's autonomous vehicle deploy...
by Retric on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @07:48AM
(#38011769)
If your road doesn’t have a bus line then that’s a problem not an inherent limitation.
Ideally you want a grid where bus lines are near intersections so going from North to East means crossing 1 street so you can go anywhere with 2 waits and a street crossing.
As to unbearably slow, there’s this idea of express busses and buss only lanes etc. The core of cities really isn’t that big, it takes forever because traffic is slow or mass transit is infrequent.