Note that the opposite can also be true: some philosophers can also be good comedians (in spite of the general stereotype that all philosophers are excruciatingly boring and dry, which can partially be attributed to the proliferation of analytic philosophy.)

For example Slavoj Zizek has a whole book dedicated to cataloguing his (often "politically incorrect") jokes. Link here: https://meydanehonar.com/Panel/Uploads/6/3/7/8d1a8c61-47d2-4...

Thank you. This is why I keep coming back here. I would not have stumbled on it on my own. It hits quite hard for me.

Fun fact: In German the words for knowledge ('Wissen') and wit/joke ('Witz') share the same root.

It's fun, and they share the two first letters but it's not a fact:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wissen#German

From Middle High German and Old High German wizzan, from Proto-West Germanic witan, from Proto-Germanic witaną, from Proto-Indo-European wóyde (“to see, to know”).

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Witz#Etymology

From Middle High German witz, from Old High German wizzi, from Proto-West Germanic witi, from Proto-Germanic witją from Proto-Indo-European weyd- (“see, know”).

Cognate to English wit, archaic Dutch wit, akin to Old Saxon giwit.

Then you click on wóyde and see that it's the

> Root stative of the root *weyd-.

:)

Thanks for sharing this! Zizek is extremely engaging but I wish he would be more perscriptive than just descriptive.

He would have had a field day if he was alive. It is a loss for all of us that he is gone.

Still, we now have Chapelle, who is building similiar legacy and potentially Bill Burr one day.

Absolute agreement on the philosopher/jester vibes.

They're not even in the same sport, let alone the same league.

Not yet, but if you watch early Carlin it is the same pattern:

1. initially safe,sanitized corporate friendly jokes 2. some commercial success 3. ? 4. jokes increasingly become a social commentary and are less and less 'friendly'

I remember early Carlin and he pushed the legal limits of radio and TV broadcast from the start. AFAIK he was also the first to cross the lines with the "7 words" one can not say on that industry. He was always providing commentary on society but what I noticed was that his views got darker and more jaded with time. He started off using his knowledge of language to be rebellious and edgy, then delving more into self analysis tearing himself apart for self deprecating routines then eventually teasing and tearing society apart.

Hmm. My point is that Carlin did not start with 7 words. That is what he is famous for, but he didn't magically show up that day to recors that line out of the blue.

I am too lazy to dig it up now, but youtube has multiple interviews that go over that stage of his life.

Yeah I am not saying he started with the 7 words either, rather he was always one of the first to push the limits as the limits evolved. There were other taboos cross prior to him.

"I Love Lucy" was the first TV show to say "Pregnant". "Bewitched" filmed Samantha wearing almost see through evening wear but television was such low resolution that the audience was unaware. The remastered DVD's make that more obvious now. There are many other lines that in hind sight seem odd now.

Not disagreeing, but since society was evolving as well, it seems more like Carlin was pushing whatever the current boundary was at the time. When he pushed and society gave a bit, he pushed more.

Trying to start his career with The Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television would have clearly been a ... non-starter.

No one ever seems to remember Lenny Bruce. Lenny Bruce was in the same league as Carlin. Carlin's seven dirty words was straight from one of Bruce's routines.

That's mostly the timeframe of his career. It doesn't put jerks at his level.

3. shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker tits

For anyone wondering, these are the seven words you can’t say on TV (or couldn’t in 1970?) and the actual monologue about them is insightful and eloquent.

This is just the punchline without the setup.

I figured in a thread about George Carlin most people would at least get the hint, and also it marked a pretty important point in his career between family friendly comedian and counter-culture icon

" ...and tits doesn't even sound like a swear word. It sounds like something you should eat.

Try new cheese-tits! Bet you can't eat just one"

R.I.P. George

Carlin and safe, sanitized corporate friendly jokes never happened. If anything he became less intentionally rude over time.

Isn’t that how he started, before the hippy dippy weatherman?

I watched the complete Carlin HBO specials about five years ago, from the 1970s up to the last one he did, and they are very anodyne at the beginning. Having watched a few documentaries about his career, they don't necessarily reflect the risks he was taking live sometimes; but really, if you watch those specials, he seems to evolve from a tediously corporate comedian into a hilarious and unstoppable force of nature. So I can understand how people would have the perception that he started out generic, as that was what the public saw in popular output he made.

Dave Chappelle walked away from money out of principle when it came to making jokes about people like him for white audiences, but happily cracks jokes about trans people. He's a has-been and a hypocrite and Carlin would end his career.

Disagree, but can you substantiate hypocrite claim? Also cancellation chance seems to depend on how 'big' you are. Chapelle wasn't cancelled despite attempts. I suspect Carlin would get in trouble, but since he had a strong following, it is hardly a given.

Refused to make jokes at the expense of one marginalized and vulnerable group he's part of, makes jokes at the expense of another he isn't. That's hypocrisy. The motivation to walk away was self-interested, not principled.

I'm not sure how a group that has the entire society bending over backwards to serve their kink can be described as marginalized or vulnerable.

Men aren't an especially marginalised and vulnerable group, even when they're attempting to mimic women. In some jurisdictions, they've even passed laws to permit such men to use any women-only space, including where women are particularly vulnerable themselves, e.g. prisons. They're getting special privileges while women are having their rights taken away.

This absurdity of pretending that men who call themselves women are actually women should certainly be open to mockery, as it's so ridiculous - both in itself, and the fact that so many people are entertaining this misogynistic delusion.

Hmm? The mere fact that there is a space exclusive to women ( key word 'safe space') should give a clear indicator, who has super powers in the relationship between the genders. Men can't even create one without weird focus on exclusionary practices, but the same is done by women is that is hailed as some weird glass ceiling.

If there is an absurdity, it is in this type of framing. Imagine, men entering women spaces! Don't they know their place? Wait..

> The mere fact that there is a space exclusive to women ( key word 'safe space') should give a clear indicator, who has super powers in the relationship between the genders.

Yes, it's the sex that has such a high proportion of predatory, dangerous and creepy individuals that the other sex need segregated spaces for their own safety and dignity. Which is also the sex of most of those who are actively trying - and often succeeding - to undermine and eradicate these safe spaces under the guise of so-called "trans rights".

The end goal of these men is that they be permitted, by law and policy, to disregard women's consent and boundaries with impunity. Not only is this wholly unacceptable, but the arguments they are using in pursuit of this goal are ridiculous. So of course comedians are going to ridicule this. I'm glad they're doing so; this misogynist activism needs all the mockery it can get, it's part of the path towards undoing the damage already caused.

What's wrong with making jokes about trans people? Christians never seem to get bothered when people make jokes about them. Not like Jews or Muslims, especially since October 7th Maybe Jews and Muslims and Trans people should be more like Christians. When someone is making a joke at your expense, turn the other cheek

Right?

What is this thing about some groups being "off limits" while others are fetishized and babied?

There's no longer anything "brave" in making a joke about a "safe group" to joke about.

In today's day and age since trans is the new sacred cow amongst certain crowds in the Western world, it seems natural that that would be the subject of jokes.

Dave Chappelle is the most overrated standup comedian in the world right now. He was funny before he left. He shouldn't have come back. He is now a cheap reactionary. He is not even in the same league as George Carlin.

Carlin was always a cheap reactionary. we are just a generation past what he was reacting to

Bill Burr is talented, he definitely has wit, but has gone in such a crusade against feminism that he is almost not funny anymore, just a angry man.

I personally love Louie C.K, he is really at showing our social boundaries, pushing us to the limits, the weirdness of them, without trying to push a narrative on how other people are just stupid.

> The better stand-up comedians are hard to distinguish from philosophers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoZ3bu23BMA

Carlin has only ever been a "philosopher" to juveniles. He was right on corporate America and the American war machine, but he was a self-loathing misanthrope and nihilist

Nihilism and misanthropy are valid philosophical positions though.

No doubt but he's a comedian, not a philosopher. Carlin's crusty curmudgeon personality never did much for me. I'm an atheist but his whole anti religion shtick really turned me off.

I recommend consulting his early/middle material... 1967–1990 maybe. You're only really referring to his last 10–15 years or so.

I've long argued that Nietzsche is actually a comedian. Agree or not with his ideas, he is hysterically funny, in this smart and subtle way, a lot like George Carlin.

Sort of agree. I'm a contrarian though that feels like Carlin got less funny the older and angrier he got.

His cynicism was beautiful, but he seemed to dropped using humor to deliver it toward the end.