News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by dralley on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @12:54PM (#37149921)
Honestly, I feel bad for the original authors, who were correctly holding out for stronger evidence but were forced into publishing early by the actions of a third party going behind their backs.

I hope they don't experience undue blowback because of this.

Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by KaoruAoiShiho on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:39PM (#37150669)
I think the story might be more complicated than that, I remember reading that the "third party" was the one paying the bills for the experiment so pushing it out early and even publicly failing would've been preferable to getting it dragged out infinitely for an unlikely hope of it being successful.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by hgsgm on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:19PM (#37152227)
This funder-rushed science exactly what created Doc Ock and the Green Goblin.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by pnt12 on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:06PM (#37152946)
Now I'm even more disappointed in the outcome!
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by gundamdoubleO on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:19PM (#37153149)
They both had some pretty ground breaking technology to be fair
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by hennell on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:40PM (#37153480)
Is this the origin of "semi-magnetic-man"?
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by zulban on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:05PM (#37150091)
I suspect the third party is the one that will mostly suffer the career consequences.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by Gud on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:19PM (#37150326)
For sure! The original researchers showed remarkable restraint considering what they were potentially sitting on. Kudos to them!
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by mgfist on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:46PM (#37150797)
Yet we're all the better for it happening. Even for the original researchers - maybe it would've taken them another 10 years to get to a similar conclusion. Now, they can take the next step and not waste more time.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by polishdude20 on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @02:54PM (#37151890)
Seems like this followed the same rule of internet answers: Ask a question and you'll get crickets. Answer a question wrong and you'll get tonnes of people telling you the right answer.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by nannal on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:23PM (#37152293)
Yeah, the power of Randlow's law cannot be understated.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by nbgoodall on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:43PM (#37152586)
Eurgh I actually Googled that, well played.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by SebJansen on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:47PM (#37152657)
yes, Steven's law has such utility
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by explaininjs on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:18PM (#37153140)
Do I read it correctly that doubling the amount of current through your fingers feels like 10x’ing it? If so… shocking.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevens's_power_law

Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by bilater on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:36PM (#37152487)
omg I love this
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by ignite on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:38PM (#37152511)
This was great science. Hypothesis, test, and attempted confirmation. Too bad it's not superconducting, but the process worked the way it is supposed to.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by themagician on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @02:36PM (#37151638)
The question is whether or not the original authors were pawns or part of the scam.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by mi_lk on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:17PM (#37153118)
I'm not aware of it, anything to read about the said third party?
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by m3kw9 on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:50PM (#37153610)
This gives them an out actually
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by avereveard on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:53PM (#37153661)
I wonder why it was so difficult for the original authors to get a pure sample, it's not like it took 10 years to create these larger crystsal.