Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by mgfist on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:46PM
(#37150797)
Yet we're all the better for it happening. Even for the original researchers - maybe it would've taken them another 10 years to get to a similar conclusion. Now, they can take the next step and not waste more time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by polishdude20 on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @02:54PM
(#37151890)
Seems like this followed the same rule of internet answers: Ask a question and you'll get crickets. Answer a question wrong and you'll get tonnes of people telling you the right answer.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by nannal on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:23PM
(#37152293)
Yeah, the power of Randlow's law cannot be understated.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by nbgoodall on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:43PM
(#37152586)
Eurgh I actually Googled that, well played.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by SebJansen on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @03:47PM
(#37152657)
yes, Steven's law has such utility
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by explaininjs on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @04:18PM
(#37153140)
Do I read it correctly that doubling the amount of current through your fingers feels like 10x’ing it? If so… shocking.