News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by madars on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:14PM (#36552329)
To those getting "Rate Limit Exceeded" or without an account, this is Elon Musk's tweet:

   To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:

   - Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
   - Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
   - New unverified accounts to 300/day
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by matsemann on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:38PM (#36552673)
I've been busy all day, and when I just opened the app I instantly got "cannot retrieve tweets at this time". No way I've reached 600 or 6000 posts. Got it from the first tweet I tried viewing.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by minimaxir on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:34PM (#36552606)
From comments and personal experience, it is incredibly likely Elon screwed up the rollout and the "600 posts/day" isn't accurate and is triggering much, much sooner than expected.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by TillE on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:39PM (#36552698)
I think a ton of users will hit 600 "posts read" really quickly, if that's what they're measuring.

Refresh your timeline, load 20 new tweets. Tap a tweet, load 10 replies, etc.

Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by minimaxir on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:42PM (#36552735)
Even if Twitter loads 20 tweets, it doesn't mean you've read 20 tweets.

This is not semantics, as tweet impressions are a separate metric Twitter tracks and would more intuitively represent reads.

Unless Twitter engineering did some malicious compliance for Elon.

Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by filleduchaos on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:48PM (#36552815)
Personally I wouldn't assume that the app that's been demonstrated to count "views" in extremely sketchy ways has suddenly started caring about the distinction between loading and reading a post. Especially when the intent is pretty obviously to herd users towards subscribing.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by minimaxir on Saturday July 01, 2023 @02:07PM (#36553089)
Fair counterpoint: Tweet views are a vanity metric (which is why Elon likes them), but tweet impressions are a required metric for advertisers to track ad CTR and any shenanigans there will actually kill Twitter.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by rideontime on Saturday July 01, 2023 @02:10PM (#36553124)
If the point is to stop scrapers, they would _have_ to use “tweets fetched” as the metric.
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by ncallaway on Saturday July 01, 2023 @02:59PM (#36553772)
The bullshit reason given for this was to “prevent bots and scrapers”, so I strongly suspect they’d be using API responses, rather than impressions.

Especially so considering how quickly some people are reporting the rate limiting impacts them

Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by damedesfleurs on Saturday July 01, 2023 @01:17PM (#36552374)
600 tweets is like 1 timeline reload for me and i follow less that 100 accounts
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by faefox on Saturday July 01, 2023 @02:00PM (#36553003)
The fact that even paid subscribers are limited to 6000 posts a day (seems like a lot, very much isn't if you're a remotely active user) is utterly bonkers. What other platform works like this?
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by meepmorp on Saturday July 01, 2023 @02:15PM (#36553213)
And that's probably 6,000 tweets loaded via API, not 6,000 that you might care about. Don't they promote and show you posts from blue checkmark people even if you're not following them?
Re:Twitter limits unverified accounts to reading 600 posts/day by upon_drumhead on Saturday July 01, 2023 @03:18PM (#36553965)
Yes, they count