News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by _kulang on Monday June 12, 2023 @09:17AM (#36292933)
How about not driving a car absolutely everywhere? Even electric cars use many times more energy than an entire household. I already eat less meat than I used to but I cannot look past the obscenely high energy use of a car
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by kiklion on Monday June 12, 2023 @09:39AM (#36293244)
Uh what?

Quick google shows that a Hyundai Ioniq gets around 4 miles per kWh. An average US household uses 886 kWh per month. You’d have to drive 3,500 miles a month to have the electric car use more energy than the entire household.

Yes, there is an energy cost in building the car, but there’s also an energy cost in building the refrigerator and dryer and washing machine etc in the house.

I’m sure some electric cars are worse than the Ioniq, but they’d have to be considerably worse to equal the energy used by a household.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Brotkrumen on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:10AM (#36293693)
>An average US household uses 886 kWh per month

Oh wow. The average German household of three uses 2500kwh in a multi-tenant and 3500kwh in a single family home PER YEAR.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by wyager on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:45AM (#36294408)
Wow, that's terrible. Do Germans not have as good of climate control or something? I wonder what it would take to get German energy consumption up to a better level. It looks like wholesale electricity costs in Germany are around 4x higher than in the US.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by milliams on Monday June 12, 2023 @12:31PM (#36296232)
I think you missed the

  PER YEAR
part. 3500 kwh per year is only 292 kwh per month, which is about three times lower than the US number quoted.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by wyager on Monday June 12, 2023 @12:44PM (#36296449)
I didn't miss that. I'm saying it's concerning that Germany's energy availability is so impoverished. To quote myself:

> I wonder what it would take to get German energy consumption up to a better level.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Timon3 on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @06:55AM (#36308296)
What is bad about using less energy? What is good about using more?
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by wyager on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @09:19PM (#36320075)
Energy usage is synonymous with level of civilization. I like civilization.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Timon3 on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @02:16AM (#36322069)
And yet, america uses much more. Shouldn't that give you a pause? :)

Jokes aside, you're describing a correlation. America does not seem "more civilized" to me, you guys are just wasteful. Wasted energy does not lead to more civilization.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by wyager on Friday June 16, 2023 @06:43PM (#36364980)
> Shouldn't that give you a pause?

No; It's completely consistent with my model. America is more advanced by a huge margin. It's also evidently a more desirable place to live; the Germany-to-USA migration rate is something like 3x the other direction.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Brotkrumen on Monday June 12, 2023 @04:17PM (#36300356)
>what it would take to get German energy consumption up to a better level

That's a good question. Prices are a good start. Consumer prices seem to be twice in G as in the US. Don't know where you get the "wholesale price is 4x in G". Most of what I can find is that wholesale is usually pretty close.

My guess of what G could do to increase consumption and thus moneys:

- Lower prices (duh). End user power is taxed heavily to subsidize industry power

- Remove mandatory energy labels on all electronics. Who really needs to know how much a TV or fridge is going to consume in power?

- Mandate "power-included" in rents. If you pay a fixed sum, you might as well leave the fridge open to cool the kitchen

- Mandate central heating and cooling. If you only pay a share of what you consume, might as well go full blast on everything

- stop subsidizing energy efficiency for new single and multi-tenant homes.

- stop building solid houses. Plywood walls are fine

Nice comparison on power prices: https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-market-report-decemb...

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by fomine3 on Monday June 12, 2023 @08:16PM (#36303316)
Does it include gas heating usage?
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Brotkrumen on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @03:19AM (#36306730)
Heating and warm water is excluded.

I can't find any "average kwh for heating" numbers though. If the US number of roughly 10.000 kwh per year included heating, that could be roughly comparable to what the German average could be. Numbers that I find range from 14.000kwh for old homes with Gas usage to 3000kwh for modern homes with heat pumps.

Would make more sense than the US average being 4x while roughly using the same electronics.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by dzhiurgis on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:33AM (#36306340)
You need to compare it with similarly cold state + adjust for house size. I bet difference would be like 20%.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by Brotkrumen on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @08:29AM (#36309274)
Yeah, sounds reasonable. I can't find any average heating kwh stats, but 4x is just improbable.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by JeremyNT on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:44AM (#36294382)
> Yes, there is an energy cost in building the car, but there’s also an energy cost in building the refrigerator and dryer and washing machine etc in the house.

I don't think you can really hand wave away that cost. My instinct is that battery, aluminum, and steel production should be very energy intensive.

The 3500+ pounds of "stuff" in your car is over an order of magnitude more "stuff" than a household appliance just by weight alone.

(Maybe we should forego the other luxuries as well, of course).

All that said I imagine the biggest direct end user energy usage would be the cost of HVAC systems running nearly continuously in inhospitable climates.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by _kulang on Thursday June 22, 2023 @11:46PM (#36442542)
It’s not that bad. Fossil fuel burn is actually much worse. I used to think this as I thought buying used cars would be a great help but the break even point for the extra cost of building an entire vehicle is something like 2 years of driving. So building all new cars with half the fuel use could reduce overall emissions after about 4 years. Electric vehicles are worth it after 2-3 years. As long as your electric vehicles run for about 5 years, even if you make a whole new car, emissions would reduce considerably

When you look at it further, you find even an electric car uses 20-30kWh/100km at highway speeds. That basically a constant 20kW. Driving a car is just stupidly energy intensive and very little can be done about that. Trains and public transport have a huge benefit in energy use per person

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by OGWhales on Monday June 12, 2023 @09:31AM (#36293128)
Where I live currently, that’s simply infeasible. It’s a city, just very poor public transit and the city was designed without pedestrians or bikers in mind.

I hope to move soon, and being able to walk/bike/take public transit is a priority for where I choose, but it makes me think there are so many places in the US where going anywhere without a car is not a realistic option. Car dependency is a big issue in the US.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by lm28469 on Monday June 12, 2023 @09:40AM (#36293260)
> Where I live currently, that’s simply infeasible.

Technology let use thrive in places we shouldn't even have lived in the first place, a lot of people just "can't" do anything, that's why we're fucked

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by OGWhales on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:04AM (#36293588)
The area was established prior to cars and was livable, but as it grew everything was designed with cars in mind and made it unlivable without them. So it’s not that cars made an unlivable place otherwise livable, it’s that cars made a livable place unlivable without them.

It’s certainly possible for another form of transit to exist in this town, but everything was designed with cars in mind and there is little interest in fixing it, because almost everyone has a car (excluding those that can't afford them, but we don't talk about that or the weak economic mobility that lack of proper public transit absolutely contributes to).

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by r00fus on Monday June 12, 2023 @04:24PM (#36300480)
> It’s a city, just very poor public transit

There's your answer, yet you hand wave it away. Mass transit for not just intracity but also putting housing close to where people want to go (parks/stores).

My non-US wife often jokes about "US city planning" being an oxymoron, and I just can't defend it.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by OGWhales on Monday June 12, 2023 @06:02PM (#36301875)
I think you got the wrong impression from my comment. I’m not hand waving it at all, I’m highlighting how much of an issue it is in the US and how unlikely it is to change.

This is an issue I’m pretty passionate about and while I’ve put a lot of effort in locally to change this, I’ve come to realize it’s not something that’s gonna be fixed in my life time. This is why I intend to move to a place that already has good public transit and good walkability.

I would hope that the demise of gas powered cars would lead to a surge of focus on non-car transportation and improved city/suburban design, but I fear that car dependency will continue on as it seems most people in the US greatly prefer the idea of electric cars to anything else. It’s a shame, as I believe cars themselves to be problematic for a whole host of reasons and I feel our society is missing out on a good opportunity to transition away from them. I’ll keep fighting the fight, but there is only so much one can do.

Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by myshpa on Monday June 12, 2023 @09:20AM (#36292969)
Yes ... fossil fuels absolutely too ... that's another reason why WFH is so important.
Re:That's a *huge* amount of energy being transferred to the... by katbyte on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:03AM (#36293578)
It might be more impactful to move as many things back to trains instead of trucking everything across the country