Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by HexDecOctBin on Friday May 05, 2023 @04:31AM
(#35826690)
What does the word "Mojo" has to do with fire to begin with? Is this some new output of meme culture? Do kids today consider the ability to create mojo using stones as the first step towards human civilisation?
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by prepend on Friday May 05, 2023 @06:52AM
(#35827597)
Mojo is a word for magic. Meme magic is a thing. Fire emoji is a meme.
That’s my attempt at making the connection.
It also just seems like a fun thing kids do. I don’t even know how to enter an emoji as a file extension so it could be a way to filter out oldsters who don’t know the new ways.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by kjs3 on Friday May 05, 2023 @12:27PM
(#35831573)
It's also a vulgar reference to the male anatomy in parts of South America. So...bonus?
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by prepend on Friday May 05, 2023 @02:30PM
(#35833334)
I guess that explains the eggplant emoji file extension.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by traverseda on Friday May 05, 2023 @11:52AM
(#35830912)
I think the fire emoji is part of the name...
Like it's meant to be represented as mojo[fire emoji]...
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by latexr on Friday May 05, 2023 @04:49AM
(#35826798)
It might have accessibility implications too. An extension which is visually busy, hard to type, and confuses people on screen readers seems like the worst of all worlds.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @12:11AM
(#35837895)
This is of course why you can still use .mojo.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by latexr on Saturday May 06, 2023 @04:06AM
(#35839238)
Which only helps if you’re programming by yourself all the time and never look at anyone else’s code.
We should strive to make the world and programming more accessible, not less. We can’t even discuss the extension on HN without spelling it out in different ways.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @05:31AM
(#35839658)
You can use emoji as identifiers in several different programming languages. I can count the number of times I've seen it actually used on one hand.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by latexr on Saturday May 06, 2023 @09:28AM
(#35841181)
There is a large difference between “you are able to use emoji inside some files” and “we’re recommending emoji as the default for every file name”.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @08:19PM
(#35846624)
I don’t see them doing this?
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by andrewstuart on Friday May 05, 2023 @07:40AM
(#35827953)
Really? The file extension is an emoji?
Decisions like that make me very wary about the quality of other decisions made in the language.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by number6 on Friday May 05, 2023 @08:40AM
(#35828469)
Can be an emoji. the file extension is .mojo or [fire]
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by coldtea on Friday May 05, 2023 @08:33AM
(#35828409)
>and unprofessional
God forbid in this era of corporate assimilation any rogue geeks do anything unprofessional!
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by mitt_romney_12 on Friday May 05, 2023 @11:35AM
(#35830606)
I don't think that a closed source language created by a corporation really meets the definition of "rogue geeks"
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by coldtea on Friday May 05, 2023 @11:58AM
(#35831045)
Xerox and AT&T were very much "serious" corporations, but both had very gogue geeks...
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by ASalazarMX on Friday May 05, 2023 @01:23PM
(#35832405)
Then Apple copied Xerox's work, and hired very vogue geeks.
An FAQ entry on how it's faster than C would be appreciated.