Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C

Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @12:11AM (#35837895)

This is of course why you can still use .mojo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C by latexr on Saturday May 06, 2023 @04:06AM (#35839238)

Which only helps if you’re programming by yourself all the time and never look at anyone else’s code.

We should strive to make the world and programming more accessible, not less. We can’t even discuss the extension on HN without spelling it out in different ways.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @05:31AM (#35839658)

You can use emoji as identifiers in several different programming languages. I can count the number of times I've seen it actually used on one hand.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C by latexr on Saturday May 06, 2023 @09:28AM (#35841181)

There is a large difference between “you are able to use emoji inside some files” and “we’re recommending emoji as the default for every file name”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C by saagarjha on Saturday May 06, 2023 @08:19PM (#35846624)

I don’t see them doing this?

[ Parent | on HN ]