News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by kennywinker on Sunday March 26, 2023 @03:15PM (#35318367)
Not an expert, but I feel like interlocking your hands does not count because the definition of a gear includes rotation, and transmission of motion. Interlocked hands don't rotate and they don't transmit motion.

Interlocking hands seems to me to be about grip strength. Sometimes it's easier to grip your other hand by interlocking than it is to grip the object you're lifting.

Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by noxer on Monday March 27, 2023 @04:46AM (#35324353)
Then the "gear" from this insect would also not count as it does not transfer motion. Its more like a joint that has teeth for extra grip.
Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by zimpenfish on Monday March 27, 2023 @06:20AM (#35324877)
> an intricate gearing system that locks their back legs together, allowing both appendages to rotate at the exact same instant

That sounds like transmission of motion to me?

Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by cjrp on Monday March 27, 2023 @09:50AM (#35326663)
If I lock my hands together, rotating one of my wrists also rotates the other wrist. I'm not saying it's a _useful_ transfer of motion though!
Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by bagacrap on Monday March 27, 2023 @10:29AM (#35327100)
Only if one leg is pushing the other leg
Re:Close-Up of the First Mechanical Gear Ever Found in Nature by rantallion on Monday March 27, 2023 @11:17AM (#35327812)
> To confirm that the gears performed this function, the researchers performed a neat (albeit morbid) trick with some dead Issus. They manually cocked their legs back in a jumping position, then electrically stimulated the main jumping muscle in one leg so that the leg extended. Because it was rotationally locked by the gears, the other non-stimulated leg moved as well, and the dead insect jumped forward.