News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient. Parent comment

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by MikeDelta on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @02:49AM (#34878068)
Today indeed, but let's see what we can do in the year 2525 (if human is still alive).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @03:56AM (#34878562)
> in the year 2525 (if human is still alive)

Hello, fellow old!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by malfist on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @11:00AM (#34882600)
Hey, I'm 33 and I love that song
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by stewarts on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @12:10PM (#34883628)
I played it for my 7 year old, it went into her requested song rotation for a good 6 months. Its just a classic!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @02:53PM (#34901653)
I'm not saying it's not a good song, or only appeals to older people, just that the probability distribution for a person's age adjusts upward (a lot) given the prior of liking that song :-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by __d on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @06:20PM (#34889173)
Heh. I have it on original vinyl.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @02:52PM (#34901627)
Daaaaaamn!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by wiz21c on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @04:52AM (#34879023)
Don't ask the question, just give the answer: we will be alive (I mean there's no other way, is it ?)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by MikeDelta on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @05:51AM (#34879469)
Definitely, I have no doubts we will be alive.

I was hinting a bit to the lyrics of the song 'In the year 2525'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Year_2525

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by usrusr on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @06:39AM (#34879862)
Definitely no other way, because if woman cannot survive nobody will be around to painstakingly increment a counter each time the planet falls around its central star.
[ Parent | on HN ]