News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient. Parent comment

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by wiz21c on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @04:52AM (#34879023)
Don't ask the question, just give the answer: we will be alive (I mean there's no other way, is it ?)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by MikeDelta on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @05:51AM (#34879469)
Definitely, I have no doubts we will be alive.

I was hinting a bit to the lyrics of the song 'In the year 2525'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Year_2525

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by usrusr on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @06:39AM (#34879862)
Definitely no other way, because if woman cannot survive nobody will be around to painstakingly increment a counter each time the planet falls around its central star.
[ Parent | on HN ]