'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @03:56AM (#34878562)

> in the year 2525 (if human is still alive)

Hello, fellow old!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by malfist on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @11:00AM (#34882600)

Hey, I'm 33 and I love that song

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by stewarts on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @12:10PM (#34883628)

I played it for my 7 year old, it went into her requested song rotation for a good 6 months. Its just a classic!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @02:53PM (#34901653)

I'm not saying it's not a good song, or only appeals to older people, just that the probability distribution for a person's age adjusts upward (a lot) given the prior of liking that song :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by __d on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @06:20PM (#34889173)

Heh. I have it on original vinyl.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:'artificial photosynthesis' claimed 10x more efficient by gcanyon on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @02:52PM (#34901627)

Daaaaaamn!

[ Parent | on HN ]